1,680
21
Essay, 3 pages (650 words)

W 3 legal topic

School: W 3 LEGAL TOPIC Lecturer: Should managed care organizations be shielded from liability when utilization review results in an adverse event?
In the opinion of Kesselheim and Brennan (2013), the goal of health care delivery can never be achieved if cost is not matched fairly with quality. What this implies is that as much as there will be the call for affordable health care, it is important to also call for quality health care at the same time so that quality will not be compromised through the effort of making healthcare affordable to all. It is out of such principles of health care that Stuart and Showalter, J. D. (2011) notes that the idea of managed care organizations was born. This is because managed care organizations have over the years served as a consortium of organizations that use various managed care techniques to bring both affordable care and quality care to care users (Svorny, 2011). Whiles playing their role, there ethical and legal responsibilities that managed care organizations become bounded to. From the article of Leslie (1994), it would be noted that the application of ethical and legal principles go hand in hand. When arguing for whether or not managed care organization must be shielded from liability when utilization review results in an adverse event, it is important to consider both sides of the argument, namely ethical and legal.
From an ethical perspective, one would notice that once managed care organizations agree to be responsible for the health care of patients, they set delimitations that have to with the fact that they do not become the direct care givers. Rather, the managed care organizations employ the services of health care service providers to give care. Meanwhile, adverse event can be noted to be a health risks that occurs at the point of reception of care. According to the National Health Directorate, adverse event is considered an ethical issue that occurs at the time of receiving care from a professional (Kesselheim and Brennan, 2013). What this means is that when utilization review results in an adverse event, it is the professional health care provider that is to blame rather than the facilitator of the care. From this perspective, it can be argued that indeed managed care organization need to be shielded from ethical based liabilities that has to do with adverse event.
From a legal perspective also, it is always important to ask the question of what the regulations state (Leslie, 1994). Leslie (1994) actually noted that the contractual provisions of managed care organizations set an indemnity clause that attempts to establish their lack of liability. The basis for this legal provision is that in most of the cases, the managed care organizations do not lay claim of ownership of the health records of patients. What is more, most modern day managed care organizations make it possible for patients to select their own therapists and health providers. In such a situation, the sole role of the managed care organization becomes to serve as a facilitator through whom the patient gets care. Because of the freedom for the patient to select therapist and the indemnity clause, there is an absolute covering for the managed care organization, which is the right thing to do. This is because if there are liabilities against the managed care organizations, most service providers can serve as saboteurs who will neglect the need to provide professional care, knowing that when there is adverse event, it is the managed care organization that will take the responsibility.
References
Kesselheim A. S and Brennan T. A (2013). The Swinging Pendulum: The Supreme Court Reverses Course on ERISA and Managed Care. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics. 5(1); 451-470
Leslie R. S (1994). On Ethics: Managed Care: Ethical and Legal Considerations in Appealing Adverse UR Decisions. The California Therapist. 7(2); 1-7
Stuart J. and Showalter, J. D. (2011). The Law of Healthcare Administration. 6th edition New York: Health Administration Press.
Svorny S. (2011). Could Mandatory Caps on Medical Malpractice Damages Harm Consumers? Policy Analysis. 685; 1-8

Thank's for Your Vote!
W 3 legal topic. Page 1
W 3 legal topic. Page 2
W 3 legal topic. Page 3
W 3 legal topic. Page 4

This work, titled "W 3 legal topic" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'W 3 legal topic'. 23 September.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, September 23). W 3 legal topic. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/w-3-legal-topic/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "W 3 legal topic." September 23, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/w-3-legal-topic/.

1. AssignBuster. "W 3 legal topic." September 23, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/w-3-legal-topic/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "W 3 legal topic." September 23, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/w-3-legal-topic/.

Work Cited

"W 3 legal topic." AssignBuster, 23 Sept. 2022, assignbuster.com/w-3-legal-topic/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving W 3 legal topic, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]