Rebuttal on legal drinking age

College Presidents call for debate on lowering the drinking age to 18 BCOM/275 May, 20 2012 Betty Bernstein College Presidents call for debate on lowering the drinking age to 18 I read the article “ College Presidents call for debate on lowering the drinking age to 18″, which was published in the Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly Newsletter on September 8, 2008. In my opinion, there is not a lot of value and credibility to this article. John McArdell, the President of Middlebury College is the head of a group called Amethyst Initiative. It is a group of 129 college presidents that would like to see the legal drinking lowered to 18 years old. This article lacks credibility as there is no statistical data to support that alcohol abuse and binge drinking would decrease by lowering the drinking age. (The problem isn’t underage drinking per se, according to John McArdell, president emeritus of Middlebury College in Middlebury, VT and spokesman for the Amethyst Initiative. The problem is that underaged drinking is now forced off campus, leading to a “ culture of clandestine, binge-drinking”, according to the group’s statement, signed by the 129 college presidents. (Periodicals, 2008)) I am confused by the above statement. I fail to see how when underage drinking occurs on campus, there is less binge-drinking versus being off campus. I would think that binge-drinking is binge-drinking and can be done anywhere. I live near Middlebury College and have observed the behavior of Middlebury College students both in the public eye and in the emergency room at the local hospital. Based upon my experience, there is a lot of underage drinking that occurs on-campus. I have been in the ER when students have been brought in from alcohol poisoning, etc. I would need to see substantial evidence that lowering the drinking age to 18 would in fact make an impact in communities nationwide. The President of NAATP issued an open letter to the college presidents. ( To Center the attention on “ at what age should it be legal to use the drug of alcohol” completely misses the larger issues of how we as a society respond to a serious public health dilemma, said the letter, which criticized the “ issuing of vitrioloc statements” as ignoring the real problem, alcohol abuse and alcholism. (Periodicals, 2008)) The information that was given by the Amethyst Initiative did not seem very reliable as again, there was no supporting evidence. It makes me wonder if there are personal reasons behind these actions. Do they want the drinking age lowered, so the students are less of a liability? Based upon what I have seen, I would think that to be true. Yes, an 18 year old can enlist in the Armed Forces and vote, are they really, truly that responsible to make good decisions about consuming Alcohol?