1,732
7
Essay, 2 pages (400 words)

Discussion thre

Ethics and Consent Ethics and Consent: Who should receive the experimental drug for Ebola? The BBC News, on August 12, reported intentions of testing Ebola experimental drugs on humans after having tried them on monkeys (BBC News, 2014). The dilemma in the case of who should receive the experimental drug for Ebola is that on one hand, there is a potential risk that the drug might have adverse effects on those to whom it is administered. On the other hand, the drug might work and not administering it will allow continued deaths from Ebola. This is an ethical dilemma because the person, who has the experimental drug, and all other people, has a moral duty to care for those suffering from Ebola and the decision about whether or not to administer the drug touches on this duty (Jackson, 2006).
The ethical principles that are relevant to this event are respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-malfeasance, and justice. Respect for autonomy requires that healthcare providers regard patients’ right to decide what happens to their bodies. Beneficence focuses on doing the best thing to a patient in all situations, while under non-malfeasance, healthcare providers endeavor not to do any harm to patients. Upholding justice makes healthcare providers to deal fairly with all patients in giving treatment or distributing scarce resources. Respect for autonomy, beneficence, and non-malfeasance are in conflict in this case. Respect for autonomy is more compelling in this case because it will allow the testing of the experimental drug with a patient’s consent. This principle would suggest and offer support for a resolution by allowing the experimenter to test the drug without breaking the law and the patient might benefit if the drug works (Sugarman & Sulmasy, 2010).
Consent and informed consent
The distinction between consent and informed consent has implications for professional healthcare providers. Informed consent protects professional healthcare providers from legal action and consent does not. Finally, in education related to informed consent, APRN should emphasize the need for healthcare providers to provide patients with sufficient information regarding any procedure for which they might intend to carry out on patients (Maclean, 2009).
References
BBC News. Ebola: Experimental drugs and vaccines. BBC New, August 12, 2014. Retrieved September 5, 2014 from http://www. bbc. com/news/health-28663217
Jackson, J. C. (2006). Ethics in medicine. Cambridge: Polity.
Maclean, A. (2009). Autonomy, informed consent and medical law: A relational challenge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sugarman, J., & Sulmasy, D. P. (2010). Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Discussion thre. Page 1
Discussion thre. Page 2
Discussion thre. Page 3

This work, titled "Discussion thre" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Discussion thre'. 18 November.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, November 18). Discussion thre. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/discussion-thre/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Discussion thre." November 18, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/discussion-thre/.

1. AssignBuster. "Discussion thre." November 18, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/discussion-thre/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Discussion thre." November 18, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/discussion-thre/.

Work Cited

"Discussion thre." AssignBuster, 18 Nov. 2022, assignbuster.com/discussion-thre/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Discussion thre, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]