Home/Health & Medicine/Corrigendum: predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human vs. human-machine interactions: a review

Review, 1 pages (150 words)

Corrigendum: predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human vs. human-machine interactions: a review

Subject: Health & Medicine

Info

Published: January 10, 2022
Updated: January 10, 2022
University / College: Dalhousie University
Language: English
Downloads: 16

A corrigendum on

Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review
by Sahaï, A., Pacherie, E., Grynszpan, O., and Berberian, B. (2017). Front. Neurorobot. 11, 52. doi: 10. 3389/fnbot. 2017. 00052

Incorrect Reference

In the original article, the reference forCaspar, et al., 2016was incorrectly written in the reference list asCaspar, E. A., Christensen, J. F., Cleeremans, A., and Haggard, P. (2016). Coercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain. Curr. Biol . 26, 585–592. doi: 10. 1016/j. cub. 2015. 12. 067

It should beCaspar, E. A., Desantis, A., Dienes, Z., Cleeremans, A., and Haggard, P. (2016). The sense of agency as tracking control. PLoS ONE 11(10): e0163892. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0163892

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

The original article has been updated.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Thank's for Your Vote!

This work, titled "Corrigendum: predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human vs. human-machine interactions: a review" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal

Cite this Review

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Corrigendum: predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human vs. human-machine interactions: a review'. 10 January.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, January 10). Corrigendum: predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human vs. human-machine interactions: a review. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/corrigendum-predictive-mechanisms-are-not-involved-the-same-way-during-human-human-vs-human-machine-interactions-a-review/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Corrigendum: predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human vs. human-machine interactions: a review." January 10, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/corrigendum-predictive-mechanisms-are-not-involved-the-same-way-during-human-human-vs-human-machine-interactions-a-review/.

1. AssignBuster. "Corrigendum: predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human vs. human-machine interactions: a review." January 10, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/corrigendum-predictive-mechanisms-are-not-involved-the-same-way-during-human-human-vs-human-machine-interactions-a-review/.

Bibliography

AssignBuster. "Corrigendum: predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human vs. human-machine interactions: a review." January 10, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/corrigendum-predictive-mechanisms-are-not-involved-the-same-way-during-human-human-vs-human-machine-interactions-a-review/.

Work Cited

"Corrigendum: predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human vs. human-machine interactions: a review." AssignBuster, 10 Jan. 2022, assignbuster.com/corrigendum-predictive-mechanisms-are-not-involved-the-same-way-during-human-human-vs-human-machine-interactions-a-review/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Corrigendum: predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human vs. human-machine interactions: a review, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]