1,577
4
Essay, 10 pages (2500 words)

The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression

Fifty years ago Jacques Miller devised a technique to thymectomize neonatal mice to explore the hypothesis that the thymus played a role in the development of immunity. He found that if thymectomized by day 3 postpartum, the mice would develop normally for the first month, but thereafter they underwent a runting syndrome similar to that observed during Graft vs. Host Disease (GvHD) ( Miller, 1962 ). During the second month of life the mice would lose weight and suffer from a dermatitis and generalized lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly followed by premature death. A more detailed examination of the immune system revealed that early after thymectomy the mice were lymphopenic and immunocompromized, unable to reject allogeneic or even xenogeneic skin grafts, and incapable of generating antibodies to routine antigens. Miller correctly interpreted his findings as evidence that the thymus appeared to be critical in the first few weeks of life for the development of a mature functional immune system, but he did not speculate on the cause of the later enigmatic development of lymphoproliferation and apparent autoimmunity.

Twenty years after Miller’s seminal observations, Shimon Sakaguchi reported that the lymphoproliferative/autoimmune diseases of immunocompromized day-3 thymectomized (d3Tx) could be transferred to neonatal mice with Thy-1+, Lyt-1+, Ly-23- splenocytes from the afflicted animals ( Sakaguchi et al., 1982b ). Furthermore, the autoimmune syndrome that developed in d3Tx mice could be completely prevented by a single intraperitoneal injection of Thy-1+, Lyt-1+, Lyt-23- splenocytes or thymocytes taken from normal adult mice ( Sakaguchi et al., 1982a ). Prior to these experiments, alloantisera reactive with Lyt-1 were thought to mark the helper T cell subset (Th cells) ( Cantor and Boyse, 1975 ; Kisielow et al., 1975 ). However, Lyt-1 alloantigens were subsequently found on all T cells to a varying degree and therefore could not be the murine equivalent to the T4 (CD4) determinants that specifically identified human Th cells, restricted to antigen recognition with MHC class II molecules ( Reinherz et al., 1979b ; Ledbetter et al., 1980 ).

Additional progress in the molecular understanding of the regulation of adaptive immunity was required before it was possible to make further progress in the dissection of these phenomena, especially the molecular mechanism(s) responsible for the apparent suppressive activities of mature T cells vs. neonatal T cells. Thus, T cell clones ( Baker et al., 1979 ) were necessary to define the molecular nature of the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) complex, including the roles of the accessory molecules CD4 and CD8 as facilitating recognition of antigenic peptides bound to MHC class II and class I, respectively ( Reinherz et al., 1979a , 1980a ), as well as the role of the CD3 molecules as triggers of antigen recognition ( Reinherz et al., 1980b ), found to be mediated by the disulfide-linked heterodimeric α and β chains ( Meuer et al., 1983 ). Thus, antigen-specific recognition by the TCR complex leads to the expression of antigen-non-specific cytokines, such as interleukin-2 (IL-2) and its receptors ( Meuer et al., 1984 ), so that the tempo, magnitude, and duration of immune responses came to be understood to depend upon antigen non-specific hormone-like molecules ( Cantrell and Smith, 1984 ; Smith, 1988 ). Inherent in these concepts was the demonstration that IL-2 interacts with specific receptors that satisfied all of the characteristics of true hormone receptors, i. e., high affinity, stereospecificity, saturability, and physiologic relevance ( Robb et al., 1981 ).

Given these findings, a totally unexpected result of the deletion of the IL-2 gene was reported by Ivan Horak’s group ( Schorle et al., 1991 ). Mice developing with the total absence of IL-2 were remarkably similar to Miller’s neonatal thymectomized mice. Intitially, the IL-2(−/−) mice grew normally and as expected were immunocompromized ( Kundig et al., 1993 ). However, as they aged there occurred a lymphoroliferative syndrome with the accumulation of activated T cells in secondary lymphoid organs and even invasion of non-lymphoid organs that culminated in premature death due to autoimmune hemolytic anemia and inflammatory bowel disease ( Horak et al., 1995 ; Sadlack et al., 1995 ).

Concurrent with these publications, Sakaguchi and his colleagues reported that a critical subset of CD4+ T cells that express the IL-2R α-chain, ~10% of mature peripheral CD4+ T cells, could prevent autoimmune diseases of immunodeficient nu/nu mice injected with immunocompetent CD4+ T cells depleted of IL-2Rα+ cells ( Sakaguchi et al., 1995 ). Subsequently, the inhibitory molecule CTLA-4 was found to play a major role in the regulatory function of CD4+IL-2Rα+ cells ( Takahashi et al., 2000 ).

The finding that CD4+IL-2Rα+CTLA-4+ cells express the transcriptional regulator FOXP3 helped to explain the phenotype of regulatory T cells (T-Regs) ( Fontenot et al., 2003 ; Hori et al., 2003 ; Walker et al., 2003 ). Moreover, IL-2 was found to be required for FOXP3 expression and the normal development of FOXP3+ cells ( Zorn et al., 2006 ; Burchill et al., 2007 ). Also, FOXP3 was found to inhibit IL-2 expression, which accounted for T-Reg anergy, and led to the conclusion that IL-2 activates a negative-feedback loop via FOXP3 that limits T cell proliferative expansion during an immune reaction ( Popmihajlov and Smith, 2008 ). However, the FOXP3-induced increase in the expression of both CTLA-4 and IL-2Rα chains did not immediately translate into mechanisms that could readily explain immunosuppression ( Wu et al., 2006 ).

A seminal breakthrough in understanding the molecular mechanisms of T-Reg immunosuppression was contributed by Pushpa Pandiyan and Michael Leonardo and their co-workers, who detailed how T-Reg cells, incapable of producing IL-2, are very efficient in binding and degrading IL-2, thereby leading to cytokine deprivation apoptosis of T-Effector cells (T-Eff) ( Pandiyan et al., 2007 ), as well as T-Regs themselves ( Pandiyan and Lenardo, 2008 ).

Thomas Hofer’s group ( Busse et al., 2010 ) and independently, Gregoire Altan-Bonnet’s group ( Feinerman et al., 2010 ), using both theoretical and experimental approaches, reported that during an immune response there is a competition for IL-2 between T-Regs and activated effector T cells (T-Effs). Moreover, Altan-Bonnet showed that the IL-2 up-regulation of the IL-2Rα+ chain, first noted soon after the IL-2Rα+ chain was discovered ( Leonard et al., 1982 ; Smith and Cantrell, 1985 ), can result in a 1000-fold increase in the affinity of IL-2 binding to the trimeric IL-2R. Consequently, T-Regs can rapidly respond to the initial IL-2 produced by T-Effs, and up-regulate IL-2Rα+ chains, which will favor IL-2 binding and degradation much more efficiently than T-Effs, which require several hours before they can express IL-2Rα+ chains upon antigen stimulation. Thus, the “ strength” of the initial antigenic stimulation, which determines the amount of IL-2 produced initially, can be overcome by T-Regs when the antigens are of low affinity or at low concentrations (i. e., “ weak”), but cannot be competed successfully by T-Regs if the antigenic stimulus is “ strong” (i. e., high affinity or at high concentrations). Assuming autoantigens to be “ weak” and non-self antigens to be “ strong,” this system could account for self–non-self recognition.

With this brief chronology as background, readers will find many of the contributions to this volume remarkable, in that many of the field leaders, but not all, have reached a consensus that the major molecular mechanism whereby T-Regs suppress T-Effs revolves around their capacity to regulate the availability of IL-2 as well as other cytokines.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to the Rubin Foundation and to the Belfer Foundation for their continued support.

References

Baker, P. E., Gillis, S., and Smith, K. A. (1979). Monoclonal cytolytic T-cell lines. J. Exp. Med . 149, 273–278.

Burchill, M., Yang, J., Vogtenhuber, C., Blazar, B., and Farrar, M. (2007). IL-2 receptor beta-dependent STAT5 activation is required for the development of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells. J. Immunol . 178, 280–290.

Busse, D., De La Rosa, M., Hobiger, K., Thurley, K., Flossdorf, M., Scheffold, A., et al. (2010). Competing feedback loops shape IL-2 signaling between helper and regulatory T lymphocytes in cellular microenvironments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 107, 3058–3063.

Cantor, H., and Boyse, E. (1975). Functional subclasses of T lymphocytes bearing different Ly antigens: I. The generation of functionally distinct T cell subclasses is a differentiative process independent of antigen. J. Exp. Med . 141, 1376–1389.

Cantrell, D. A., and Smith, K. A. (1984). The interleukin-2 T-cell system: a new cell growth model. Science 224, 1312–1316.

Feinerman, O., Jentsch, G., Sneddon, M., Emonet, T., Smith, K., and Altan-Bonnet, G. (2010). Single-cell quantification of IL-2 dynamics in effector and regulatory T cells reveals critical plasticity in immune responses. Mol. Syst. Biol . 6: 437. doi: 10. 1038/msb. 2010. 90

Fontenot, J., Gavin, M., and Rudensky, A. (2003). Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol . 4, 330–336.

Horak, I., Lohler, J., Ma, A., and Smith, K. (1995). Interleukin-2 deficient mice: a new model to study autoimmunity and self-tolerance. Immunol. Rev . 148, 35–44.

Hori, S., Nomura, T., and Sakaguchi, S. (2003). Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor FOXP3. Science 299, 1057–1061.

Kisielow, P., Hirst, J., Shiku, H., Beverley, P., Hoffman, M., Boyse, E., et al. (1975). Ly antigens as markers for functionally distinct subpopulations of thymus-derived lymphocytes of the mouse. Nature 253, 219–220.

Kundig, T. M., Schorle, H., Bachmann, M. F., Hengartner, H., Zinkernagel, R. M., and Horak, I. (1993). Immune responses in interleukin-2-deficient mice. Science 262, 1059–1061.

Ledbetter, J., Rouse, R., Micklem, H., and Herzenberg, L. (1980). T cell subsets defined by expression of Lyt1, 2, 3 and Thy1 antigens. Two parameter immunofluorescence and cytotoxicity analysis with monclonal antibodies modifies current views. J. Exp. Med . 152, 280.

Leonard, W. J., Depper, J. M., Uchiyama, T., Smith, K. A., Waldmann, T. A., and Greene, W. C. (1982). A monoclonal antibody that appears to recognize the receptor for human T-cell growth factor; partial characterization of the receptor. Nature 300, 267–269.

Meuer, S. C., Fitzgerald, K. A., Hussey, R. E., Hodgdon, J. C., Schlossman, S., and Reinherz, E. L. (1983). Clonotypic structures involved in antigen-specific human T cell function. Relationship to the T3 molecular comlex. J. Exp. Med . 157, 705–719.

Meuer, S. C., Hussey, R. E., Cantrell, D. A., Hodgen, J. C., Schlossman, S. F., Smith, K. A., et al. (1984). Triggering the T3-Ti antigen-receptor complex results in clonal T cell proliferation through an interleukin 2-dependent autocrine pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 81, 1509–1513.

Miller, J. (1962). Effect of neonatal thymectomy on the immunological responsiveness of the mouse. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 156, 415–428.

Pandiyan, P., Conti, H., Zheng, L., Peterson, A., Mathem, D., Hernandez-Santos, N., et al. (2012). CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells promote Th17 cells in vitro and enhance host resistance in mouse Candida albicans Th17 cell infection model. Immunity 34, 422–434.

Pandiyan, P., and Lenardo, M. (2008). The control of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell survival. Biol. Direct 3, 1745–1757.

Pandiyan, P., Zheng, L., Ishihara, S., Reed, S., and Lenardo, M. (2007). CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells induce cytokine deprivation-mediated apoptosis of effector CD4+ T cells. Nat. Immunol . 8, 1353–1362.

Popmihajlov, Z., and Smith, K. (2008). Negative feedback regulation of T cells via interleukin-2 and FOXP3 reciprocity. PLoS ONE 3: e1581. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0001581

Reinherz, E., Kung, P., Goldstein, G., and Schlossman, S. (1979a). Further characterization of the human inducer T cell subset defined by monoclonal antibody. J. Immunol . 123, 2894–2896.

Reinherz, E. L., Kung, P. C., Goldstein, G., and Schlossman, S. F. (1979b). Separation of functional subsets of human T cells by a monoclonal antibody. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 76, 4061–4065.

Reinherz, E., Kung, P., Goldstein, G., and Schlossman, S. (1980a). A monoclonal antibody reactive with the human cytotoxic/suppressor T cell subset previously defined by a heteroantiserum termed TH2. J. Immunol . 124, 1301–1307.

Reinherz, E. L., Hussey, R. E., and Schlossman, S. F. (1980b). A monoclonal antibody blocking human T cell function. Eur. J. Immunol . 10, 758–762.

Robb, R. J., Munck, A., and Smith, K. A. (1981). T cell growth factor receptors: quantitation, specificity, and biological relevance. J. Exp. Med . 154, 1455–1474.

Sadlack, B., Lohler, J., Schorle, H., Klebb, G., Haber, H., Sickel, E., et al. (1995). Generalized autoimmune disease in interleukin-2-deficient mice is triggered by an uncontrolled activation and proliferation of CD4+ T cells. Eur. J. Immunol . 25, 3053–3059.

Sakaguchi, S., Sakaguchi, N., Asano, M., Itoh, M., and Toda, M. (1995). Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol . 155, 1151–1164.

Sakaguchi, S., Takahashi, T., and Nishizuka, Y. (1982a). Study on cellular events in post-thymectomy autoimmune oophoritis in mice II. Requirement of Lyt-1 cells in normal female mice for prevention of oophoritis. J. Exp. Med . 156, 1577–1586.

Sakaguchi, S., Takahashi, T., and Nishizuka, Y. (1982b). Study on cellular events in post-thymectomy autoimmune oophoritis in mice. I. Requirement of Lyt-1 effector cells for oocytes damage after adoptive transfer. J. Exp. Med . 156, 1565–1576.

Schorle, H., Holtschke, T., Hunig, T., Schimpl, A., and Horak, I. (1991). Development and function of T cells in mice rendered interleukin-2 deficient by gene targeting. Nature 352, 621–624.

Smith, K. A. (1988). Interleukin-2: inception, impact, and implications. Science 240, 1169–1176.

Smith, K. A., and Cantrell, D. A. (1985). Interleukin 2 regulates its own receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 82, 864–868.

Takahashi, T., Tagami, T., Yamazaki, S., Uede, T., Shimizu, J., Sakaguchi, N., et al. (2000). Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by CD25(+)CD4(+) regulatory T cells constitutively expressing cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. J. Exp. Med . 192, 303–310.

Walker, M., Kasprowicz, D., Gersuk, V., Benard, A., Landeghen, J., Buckner, J., et al. (2003). Induction of Foxp3 and acquisition of T regulatory activity by stimulated human CD4+CD25- T cells. J. Clin. Invest . 112, 1437–1443.

Wu, Y., Borde, M., Heissmeyer, V., Feuerer, M., Lapan, A., Stroud, J., et al. (2006). FOXP3 controls regulatory T cell function through cooperation with NFAT. Cell 126, 375–387.

Zorn, E., Nelson, E., Mohseni, M., Porcheray, F., Kim, H., Litsa, D., et al. (2006). IL-2 regulates FOXP3 expression in human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells through a STAT-dependent mechanism and induces the expansion of these cells in vivo . Blood 108, 1571–1579.

Thank's for Your Vote!
The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression. Page 1
The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression. Page 2
The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression. Page 3
The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression. Page 4
The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression. Page 5
The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression. Page 6
The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression. Page 7
The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression. Page 8
The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression. Page 9

This work, titled "The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression'. 21 August.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, August 21). The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/the-molecular-mechanisms-of-regulatory-t-cell-immunosuppression/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression." August 21, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/the-molecular-mechanisms-of-regulatory-t-cell-immunosuppression/.

1. AssignBuster. "The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression." August 21, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/the-molecular-mechanisms-of-regulatory-t-cell-immunosuppression/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression." August 21, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/the-molecular-mechanisms-of-regulatory-t-cell-immunosuppression/.

Work Cited

"The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression." AssignBuster, 21 Aug. 2022, assignbuster.com/the-molecular-mechanisms-of-regulatory-t-cell-immunosuppression/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving The molecular mechanisms of regulatory t cell immunosuppression, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]