1,730
26
Essay, 3 pages (550 words)

The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities

THE CASE ABOUT RF AND TATARSTAN DELEGATION OF AUTHORITIES 1. Why Tatarstan was succeeded to be the “ elected” region in terms of its’ authorities? As far as I could understand, the reasons why Tatarstan was chosen for delegation of Authorities and this Agreement are mostly historical.

Historical and political preconditions of Tatarstan turned in such way, that Russian Federation and Tatarstan were nearly in equal position. For example, Tatarstan was independent co-founder of USSR, Tatarstan Tatarstan did not participate in election of State Duma in December 1993, Tatarstan did not sign the Federative Agreement in 1992.

This shows the level of independence of Tatarstan from Russian Federation. In my opinion, Tatarstan was not very powerful republic, thus, to keep on developing it needed an alliance. It had political independence, but in terms of resources and power it did not have much. Russia, on the other hand, wanted to avoid appearance of another country just in the very heart of it.

To avoid repeat of Chechnya Case, Russian Authorities decided to change the way they behave about it. Instead of gaining power using military forces, Russian Federation took the way of diplomacy and political alliance.

Thus, we can say that both sides needed this agreement, bith sides could benefit from it, but in my opinion, Tatarstan would need it more than Russia, in the case of different location. 2. Suggest some more or less objective criteria to select regions for establishing special favorable regime of relations with the federal center.

This question in my point of view cannot have theoretical solution, because in any different case there would be new accomplishments and new terms, that would challenge the theory pretty much.

But still, some tips could be defined. I think that in century of innovations and technological development, very important aspect would be potential rate of development of the region. It’s not important how much the region is developed, it’s much more vital – how can we develop it. In what way we can grow industry, or culture or trade or any other side of life of country.

This criterion is very subjective, I understand this, but this is more an advantage than a disadvantage.

Because government should realize itself, for what reason it needs the region, why it is necessary to develop favorable relations with this or that region, in what way it could be profitable. From history of Russian Empire we know examples of having totally useless for Empire regions (Poland) and caused a lot of trouble in tries to keep it quiet and not rebelling. 3. What is the author’s opinion on respect of whether special delegation of authorities between Tatarstan and RF is a good thing? Do you agree with him and why?

On example of RF and Tatarstan Agreement we can see how idea of federal construction, integration and decentralization actually works.

Author has very positive opinion about creating decentralized country and going on forward in development of this way. I do not have any real opinion about this, but if we look at 70 years of centralized country, and look at what do we have to suffer afterwards, I would say that decentralization is the right way to develop country federal structure, so that all the knowledge and all the experience is circulating among regions, and let develop the weak.

Thank's for Your Vote!
The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities. Page 1
The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities. Page 2
The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities. Page 3
The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities. Page 4

This work, titled "The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities'. 15 January.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, January 15). The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/the-case-about-rf-and-tatarstan-delegation-of-authorities/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities." January 15, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/the-case-about-rf-and-tatarstan-delegation-of-authorities/.

1. AssignBuster. "The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities." January 15, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/the-case-about-rf-and-tatarstan-delegation-of-authorities/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities." January 15, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/the-case-about-rf-and-tatarstan-delegation-of-authorities/.

Work Cited

"The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities." AssignBuster, 15 Jan. 2022, assignbuster.com/the-case-about-rf-and-tatarstan-delegation-of-authorities/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving The case about rf and tatarstan delegation of authorities, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]