1,997
19
Response Essay, 4 pages (900 words)

Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro

A commentary on
Commentary: Morphologically Distinct Escherichia coli Bacteriophages Differ in Their Efficacy and Ability to Stimulate Cytokine Release In Vitro

by Dufour, N., Henry, M., Ricard, J.-D., and Debarbieux, L. (2016). Front. Microbiol. 7: 1029. doi: 10. 3389/fmicb. 2016. 01029

In their recent commentary on our manuscript entitled “ Morphologically Distinct Escherichia coli Bacteriophages Differ in Their Efficacy and Ability to Stimulate Cytokine Release In vitro ,” Dufour et al. suggest that the level of cytokine response generated in our paper is due to remaining bacterial debris rather than true differences between individual phages ( Dufour et al., 2016 ).

Although at their core the two preparative methods are similar (both require filtration, CsCl centrifugation and dialysis). The additional purification step (the EndoTrap Blue system) binds endotoxins based on the conserved core of lipopolysaccharide ( http://www. hyglos. de/en/products-services/products/endotoxin-removal/faq. html ), which to our understanding is achieved through lipopolysaccharide specific binding to a phage derived protein. However, as Dufour et al. rightly point out, “ bacterial lysates may also contain several pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) able to elicit a pro-inflammatory response, such as flagellin (sensed by TLR-5), unmethylated CpG Oligodeoxynucleotide DNA (TLR-9), lipoteichoic acid from Gram-positive bacteria (TLR-2) and triacyl lipopeptides (TLR-1 with TLR-2) ( Akira and Hemmi, 2003 ).” While such additional debris components may initially be in the minority of remaining debris, they would not be removed by the Endotrap system and may not be quantified as part of a Limulus amebocyte lystate (LAL) assay. Indeed, there have been previous instances where LAL assessment of phage preparations required alternative quantification methods ( Merabishvili et al., 2009 ) or produced non-comparative results to an ELISA based system ( Szermer-Olearnik and Boratyński, 2015 ). Therefore, had a true comparative analysis between the preparative methods and the same bacterial species been performed, differences could potentially have been less. However, to our knowledge no such studies have been performed.

With hindsight and a thorough data audit, we would certainly concur that at least some component of the observed cytokine responses are due to remaining contaminants and that additional purification steps such as chromatography will further reduce possible contaminants. However, such additional steps could come at a cost, reduce overall phage concentration and potentially require additional concentration steps ( Boratyński et al., 2004 ). As such we would suggest appropriate caution when interpreting our data and would highlight that the other data presented in the paper are consistent with the position that phages are not directly cytotoxic ( Merabishvili et al., 2009 ; Chhibber et al., 2014 ; Henein et al., 2016 ).

However, while it is likely that some component of the cytokine response generated is due to remaining contaminants, additional variation could also be introduced through factors which are uncontrollable, such as genetic variation in Toll receptors between different donors ( Netea et al., 2012 ).

Despite the suggestion to the contrary provided by the Dufour et al. commentary, the reduction and quantification of endotoxin in phage preparations remains an active area of research ( Branston et al., 2015 ; Szermer-Olearnik and Boratyński, 2015 ) as more effective, less labor intensive, and perhaps most importantly for commercial development, more cost effective methods are sought. However, this highlights the disparity between preparative methods for phage assessment and once again shows the urgent need for standardized methods and acceptance criteria, similar to those employed in antibiotic and biocide development to be developed.

Author Contributions

MKM, YH, MN, CC, ES-E, and AN: Writing of the reply and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Akira, S., and Hemmi, H. (2003). Recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns by TLR family. Immunol. Lett. 85, 85–95. doi: 10. 1016/S0165-2478(02)00228-6

Boratyński, J., Syper, D., Weber-Dabrowska, B., Łusiak-Szelachowska, M., Poźniak, G., and Górski, A. (2004). Preparation of endotoxin-free bacteriophages. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 9, 253–259. Available online at: http://www. cmbl. org. pl/pdf/Vol9_p253. pdf

PubMed Abstract

Branston, S. D., Wright, J., and Keshavarz-Moore, E. (2015). A non-chromatographic method for the removal of endotoxins from bacteriophages. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 112, 1714–1719. doi: 10. 1002/bit. 25571

Chhibber, S., Gupta, P., and Kaur, S. (2014). Bacteriophage as effective decolonising agent for elimination of MRSA from anterior nares of BALB/c mice. BMC Microbiol. 14: 212. doi: 10. 1186/s12866-014-0212-8

Dufour, N., Henry, M., Ricard, J.-D., and Debarbieux, L. (2016). Commentary: morphologically distinct Escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro . Front. Microbiol. 7: 1029. doi: 10. 3389/fmicb. 2016. 01029

Henein, A. E., Hanlon, G. W., Cooper, C. J., Denyer, S. P., and Maillard, J. Y. (2016). A partially purified Acinetobacter baumannii phage preparation exhibits no cytotoxicity in 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells. Front. Microbiol. 7: 1198. doi: 10. 3389/fmicb. 2016. 01198

Merabishvili, M., Pirnay, J. P., Verbeken, G., Chanishvili, N., Tediashvili, M., Lashkhi, N., et al. (2009). Quality-controlled small-scale production of a well-defined bacteriophage cocktail for use in human clinical trials. PLoS ONE 4: e4944. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0004944

Netea, M. G., Wijmenga, C., and O’Neill, L. A. (2012). Genetic variation in Toll-like receptors and disease susceptibility. Nat. Immunol. 13, 535–542. doi: 10. 1038/ni. 2284

Szermer-Olearnik, B., and Boratyński, J. (2015). Removal of endotoxins from bacteriophage preparations by extraction with organic solvents. PLoS ONE 10: e0122672. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0122672

Thank's for Your Vote!
Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro. Page 1
Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro. Page 2
Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro. Page 3
Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro. Page 4
Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro. Page 5
Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro. Page 6

This work, titled "Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Response Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro'. 4 October.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, October 4). Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/response-commentary-morphologically-distinct-escherichia-coli-bacteriophages-differ-in-their-efficacy-and-ability-to-stimulate-cytokine-release-in-vitro/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro." October 4, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/response-commentary-morphologically-distinct-escherichia-coli-bacteriophages-differ-in-their-efficacy-and-ability-to-stimulate-cytokine-release-in-vitro/.

1. AssignBuster. "Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro." October 4, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/response-commentary-morphologically-distinct-escherichia-coli-bacteriophages-differ-in-their-efficacy-and-ability-to-stimulate-cytokine-release-in-vitro/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro." October 4, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/response-commentary-morphologically-distinct-escherichia-coli-bacteriophages-differ-in-their-efficacy-and-ability-to-stimulate-cytokine-release-in-vitro/.

Work Cited

"Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro." AssignBuster, 4 Oct. 2022, assignbuster.com/response-commentary-morphologically-distinct-escherichia-coli-bacteriophages-differ-in-their-efficacy-and-ability-to-stimulate-cytokine-release-in-vitro/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Response: commentary: morphologically distinct escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release in vitro, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]