2,014
9
Essay, 3 pages (600 words)

Parallel universes

Education Parallel Universes In responding to teachers’ controversial lifestyles and out-of-school conduct, dilemmas have surfaced endlessly since the way one action is addressed in a certain scenario might not the same in another setting. It might not be possible to totally prevent the occurrence of controversial behaviors but some of the recent cases have raised much concerns about to what extent the school officials and the law may go when regulating teacher’s out-of-school conduct. The community setting also dictates and influences course of action to regulate conduct.
Cases identification: Different Ways of Addressing Related Issues
Scenario
Using law in a rural community
In a Big City
In a School Setting
A teacher insulting and abusing her husband’ mistress
Summoning and punishment
Legal action: Filing cases against the action
Suspension to condemn the behavior and instill discipline
A teacher’s topless photos appearing on social media e. g. Facebook
Coercion into resigning,
Public criticism,
Summons in due course
Criticism in all means to condemn the behavior , fines if possible
Dismissal as it might interfere with attitude, performance and reputation
Drug possession in a private car
Calling for legal action
legal action to regulate conduct
Immediate dismissal
Participating in wet T-shirt contests
Not responsible. Does not affect outsiders
Overlook
Soft disciplinary actions e. g. fines
Teachers failure to file income taxes
Forwarding to top authorities.
Legal action to call for responsiveness
Far the school’s responsibility. Ignored
Dealing with private life issues continue to pose a great challenge in the legal setting bearing in mind that there is no standard regulations to handle similar cases. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment regulates interference with privacy by stipulating that no state has the capacity to deprive anyone life, liberty, or property without due execution of the law (Williams, 2010). In a school setting, the substantive due process offers the state some powers to regulate certain activities hence effective handling of teachers’ controversial lifestyles that might interfere with reputation or ability to perform. In cases of dismissal or charges against any teacher adequate explanation of the evidence must be provided though the due process does not prescribe reasons for dismissal apart from the procedures (Alexander & Alexander, 2011).
The law provides directions to regulate behavior while at times it may not be very effective in explaining to what extent the standards of behavior should be. At times double standardization is evident though the law plays its part by dictating the necessary procedures. The school officials must be very vigilant when dealing with out-of-school’s conduct since not all jurisdictions have adopted the nexus theory. The nexus theory holds it that teacher’s off-duty conduct might negatively affect his/her teaching effectiveness hence the need to discipline behaviors (Elis, 2010). In regard to the precepts of the theory, more emphasis is attached to the impact of the teacher’s off-duty conduct hence disciplining in equal measure.
The community standards also influence to a great extent issues involving teachers’ out-of-school conduct. Depending with the responsiveness and awareness of the community to initiate a course of action towards out of conduct issues, behaviors may be encouraged or discouraged. For instance, as illustrated in the table the response is not equal in weight in the rural setting as compared with the big city. Communities may have their own style of handling issues and this in turn affects conduct. In locales to note, an exposed community will have an upper hand to deal with social media controversies, which the remote or extremely rural setting might not be well positioned to handle. However, standards should be maintained all through.
References
Alexander, K., & Alexander, M. D. (2011). American public school law. Cengage Learning.
Ellis, R. (2010). Second language acquisition, teacher education and language pedagogy. Language teaching, 43(02), 182-201.
Williams, R. C. (2010). The One and Only Substantive Due Process Clause. The Yale Law Journal, 408-512.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Parallel universes. Page 1
Parallel universes. Page 2
Parallel universes. Page 3
Parallel universes. Page 4

This work, titled "Parallel universes" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Parallel universes'. 8 January.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, January 8). Parallel universes. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/parallel-universes/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Parallel universes." January 8, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/parallel-universes/.

1. AssignBuster. "Parallel universes." January 8, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/parallel-universes/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Parallel universes." January 8, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/parallel-universes/.

Work Cited

"Parallel universes." AssignBuster, 8 Jan. 2022, assignbuster.com/parallel-universes/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Parallel universes, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]