1,757
13
Case Study, 2 pages (250 words)

Of a philosophical argument about how science

Case study The basis of scientific method is making accurate observations. If a given premise, on how nature works survives the various tests it is put into by competent observers, then it becomes a scientific law. Francis Bacon asserted that reason is the rule in inductive method. It entails starting with several observations of nature so as to create a few but powerful statements on how nature works. David Hume’s idea that the scientific method is the source of knowledge in human beings is consistent with Bacon’s view on the induction method. However, they differ when Hume comes up with the argument that causality can never be perceived. His belief was that empiricism had no place for causality and that human beings learn through associations with each other and arguments they have with friends. This gave rise to the issue of induction in philosophy.
On the other hand, Tomas Kuhn was of the idea that knowledge comes through the revolution of science. He proposes that the origin of knowledge is through observations and drawing practical conclusions, which can be tested scientifically. Other scholars carry out empirical tests on facts proposed by one scholar. They develop new models to provide plausible explanations for the old and new observations. This explanation is consistent with Bacon’s proposal on inductive process of arriving at knowledge. The view on scientific method by Bacon has been in use in the contemporary world of ideas and science, where concepts are continually tested, and put in the swing of things. (Shuttleworth, 2009).
References
Shuttleworth, M. (2009). History of the Philosophy of Science. Available from

Thank's for Your Vote!
Of a philosophical argument about how science. Page 1
Of a philosophical argument about how science. Page 2

This work, titled "Of a philosophical argument about how science" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Case Study

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Of a philosophical argument about how science'. 15 January.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, January 15). Of a philosophical argument about how science. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/of-a-philosophical-argument-about-how-science/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Of a philosophical argument about how science." January 15, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/of-a-philosophical-argument-about-how-science/.

1. AssignBuster. "Of a philosophical argument about how science." January 15, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/of-a-philosophical-argument-about-how-science/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Of a philosophical argument about how science." January 15, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/of-a-philosophical-argument-about-how-science/.

Work Cited

"Of a philosophical argument about how science." AssignBuster, 15 Jan. 2022, assignbuster.com/of-a-philosophical-argument-about-how-science/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Of a philosophical argument about how science, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]