1,261
7
Essay, 2 pages (350 words)

Employee discharge and arbitration

Northwest Electronics Corporation’s plant security guard, Ralph Von Strasser, had no right to search the female guard without explicitly explaining to her what the search was for. If she decides to have a court case, she will have a chance of securing a hearing because of the behavior of her employer’s security guard.

Employers do not have the right to conduct searches on their workers even if they suspect that the workers might be carrying weapons unless there is a statute allowing it. If they are unsure, it is better to request the services of the police (Repa, 2010). A worker can assert that body searches(s) conducted on personal property infringe on their individual rights to private life. It is a basic code of the law that every individual’s body and personal property is inviolate. Any type of physical contact, even plain touching, or searching personal effects, if it upsets the person in question, is prohibited when there is no consent. To carry out a search of a worker’s personal effects without their permission could hence comprise of a type of assault.

There may also be civil avenues for help that are accessible by the female worker for the civil transgression of infringement on her rights. On the other hand, if there was a definite provision in the employee’s contract, which she had signed on being hired, and it was stipulated that searches for weapons were part of the company’s policy, the employer might have a right to conduct searches. Still, an employer should observe caution. If the worker refused to have her purse searched, then it is likely to be interpreted in court that she had reserved her previous consent. The fact that she was fired makes it possible for her to sue the corporation for constructive unfair discharge. The court will then investigate to establish if there are grounds for such a claim with consideration of all of the circumstances (Joel, 2001).

If there is a contractual stipulation permitting the employer to carry out random searches on the staff, then such a rebuff from the female employee could be viewed as a breach of contract and the dismissal is viewed as disciplinary action. Still, the guard would be chastised because he did not explain to the employee why he wished to check her purse, but crudely sought to search it.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Employee discharge and arbitration. Page 1
Employee discharge and arbitration. Page 2
Employee discharge and arbitration. Page 3

This work, titled "Employee discharge and arbitration" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Employee discharge and arbitration'. 28 September.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, September 28). Employee discharge and arbitration. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/employee-discharge-and-arbitration/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Employee discharge and arbitration." September 28, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/employee-discharge-and-arbitration/.

1. AssignBuster. "Employee discharge and arbitration." September 28, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/employee-discharge-and-arbitration/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Employee discharge and arbitration." September 28, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/employee-discharge-and-arbitration/.

Work Cited

"Employee discharge and arbitration." AssignBuster, 28 Sept. 2022, assignbuster.com/employee-discharge-and-arbitration/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Employee discharge and arbitration, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]