1,978
30
Essay, 2 pages (300 words)

Discussion #1 aps 210

due: Security in Faith-based Organization Facilities As much as church, synagogue and temple goers insist on maintaining a peaceful and welcoming atmosphere in their congregations, they need to accept the fact that they exist in a very dangerous world where they ought to be extra cautious to keep their lives (Harrell 7). The various religious leaders in the country ought to come together and establish some general security systems to be put up in the various faith-based facilities. Then the heads of each of the facilities ought to set up some security measures in accordance to their specific traits then keep the congregation members alert on security details without causing an alarm.
2. The best security technologies for faith-based facilities are the least physically noticeable ones as they cause less obtrusion for the parishioners. These include inbuilt electronic door locks, access controls, hidden surveillance cameras, motion detectors and metal detectors. Security strategies include training the facility attendants on security surveillance, developing a sound emergency action plan, and enhancing instant communication systems for emergencies.
3. Before establishing the security enhancements for the places of worship, it is important to notify the parishioners and the surrounding community of the intended changes of the intended changes and their purposes. This step avoids any alarms and misunderstandings that may occur from security upgrades.
4. One similarity is that both cases receive protection from similar threats, which most of the times are terrorism and theft. A difference is that faith based organization facilities receive far more discreet protection measures, which impede on personal privacy on a much lesser scale the than U. S. Critical Infrastructures. Faith based organization facilities also receive protection on a much smaller scale in terms of monetary investments and level of expertise than the Critical Infrastructure locations (Harrell 9).
Work Cited
Harrell, Brian. Security challenges for houses of worship. Journal of Physical Security. (2010).
4(2), 1-9.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Discussion #1 aps 210. Page 1
Discussion #1 aps 210. Page 2
Discussion #1 aps 210. Page 3

This work, titled "Discussion #1 aps 210" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2021) 'Discussion #1 aps 210'. 14 November.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2021, November 14). Discussion #1 aps 210. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/discussion-1-aps-210/

References

AssignBuster. 2021. "Discussion #1 aps 210." November 14, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/discussion-1-aps-210/.

1. AssignBuster. "Discussion #1 aps 210." November 14, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/discussion-1-aps-210/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Discussion #1 aps 210." November 14, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/discussion-1-aps-210/.

Work Cited

"Discussion #1 aps 210." AssignBuster, 14 Nov. 2021, assignbuster.com/discussion-1-aps-210/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Discussion #1 aps 210, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]