1,289
24
Report, 3 pages (600 words)

Country report critique

Task: EXTRA CREDIT COUNTRY CASE GRADING EXERCISE ____________________________________________ Country: ___________________________________________________
CRITERIA
Points Received
Maximum Points
Grading Comments
Whether the philosophy/foreign policy of (Your Selected Country) facilitate cooperation or conflict? Whether the patterns of globalization in the country support the hyperglobalist, sceptics, or transformationalist view? Whether the country’s winners and losers from the process of globalization are represented through the NIE, the SPG, the Outliers, or Feminist Economics perspective? And whether the phenomenon of globalization in the country has called for government intervention?
18 points
22 points
There is a good interpretation of Pakistan’s philosophy.
Ideal identification of conflicting issues in the selected country.
There was also observance of relevant choice of examples of conflicts in Pakistan.
Lack of clarity in highlighting the different patterns of globalization in Pakistan, which support either hyperactive globalist, skeptics or transformationalist views.
Mention of representation of special groups (winners and losers) in required perspectives was not adequate. More examples are required in order to make the explanations offered clear.
Intervention of government in globalization phenomenon not mentioned in the paper.

CRITICAL THINKING CRITERIA: Presents, interprets, and analyzes relevant information, data, or evidence; Develops and presents argument, position or hypothesis, with implications
2 points
3= exemplary; 2= acceptable; 1= unacceptable
Relevant interpretation of the data, which has been mentioned in the paper.
How developed is _______ in regard to the concept of competitive advantage of nations? How has _______ adjusted to the age of nonpolarity (numerous centers with meaningful power)? And whether the relations between the state and corporations in ________ can be described as state capitalism or market capitalism?
19 points
22 points
It is not true that Pakistan has sufficiently embraced the concept of competitive advantage.
There was no description of the relation between corporations and the state in Pakistan.
CRITICAL THINKING CRITERIA: Presents, interprets, and analyzes relevant information, data, or evidence; Develops and presents argument, position or hypothesis, with implications
2 points
3= exemplary; 2= acceptable; 1= unacceptable
There were acceptable developments and implications from the essay.
Whether or has ______ managed or has been altered because of the new geopolitics of energy or other scarce natural resources (i. e., water, etc)? How do the country’s identity politics and diasporas affect the country’s economic development? And whether _______ has solved or has been impeded by the puzzle of economic development?
17 points
22 points
There was provision of sketchy examples of natural resources.
The mention of whether the economic development puzzle was solved in Pakistan is unclear.
CRITICAL THINKING CRITERIA: Presents, interprets, and analyzes relevant information, data, or evidence; Develops and presents argument, position or hypothesis, with implications
2 points
3= exemplary; 2= acceptable; 1= unacceptable
Very good examples used.
Minimum 5 scholarly resources (3 points each)
9 points
12 points
Most work cited is from magazines. Include more citations that are scholarly.
CRITICAL THINKING CRITERIA: Considers context, assumptions, and other perspectives
2 points
3= exemplary; 2= acceptable; 1= unacceptable
There was citation of articles, which were relevant to the topic.
Minimum page requirement (5 – 8 pages)
4 points
5 points
Satisfaction of number of pages required was observed.
Organization
1 point
2 points
Some paragraphs are very long.
CRITICAL THINKING CRITERIA: Identifies problem, question, or issue; Draws meaningful or justified conclusions; Communicates with regard to complex problems
3 points
3= exemplary; 2= acceptable; 1= unacceptable
There was proper identification of problems affecting Pakistan. Additionally, a meaningful conclusion was reached at.
Total Points
79 points
100 points
A paper that is well written but could be better if there was inclusion of more relevant examples central to Pakistan. Further, there should be correction of all grammar mistakes that are observed in the paper.
Works Cited
Speck, Bruce. Grading Student Writing: An Annotated Bibliography. New York, NY: Information Age
Publ, 2005. Print.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Country report critique. Page 1
Country report critique. Page 2
Country report critique. Page 3
Country report critique. Page 4
Country report critique. Page 5

This work, titled "Country report critique" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Report

References

AssignBuster. (2021) 'Country report critique'. 20 December.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2021, December 20). Country report critique. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/country-report-critique/

References

AssignBuster. 2021. "Country report critique." December 20, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/country-report-critique/.

1. AssignBuster. "Country report critique." December 20, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/country-report-critique/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Country report critique." December 20, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/country-report-critique/.

Work Cited

"Country report critique." AssignBuster, 20 Dec. 2021, assignbuster.com/country-report-critique/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Country report critique, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]