- Published: December 19, 2021
- Updated: December 19, 2021
- University / College: Arizona State University
- Language: English
- Downloads: 8
A Commentary on
SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor
by Hoffmann, M., Kleine-Weber, H., Schroeder, S., Krüger, N., Herrler, T., Erichsen, S., et al. (2020). Cell 181, 271–280. doi: 10. 1016/j. cell. 2020. 02. 052
In December 2019, a novel pneumonia condition termed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was reported in Wuhan, China ( 1 ). The global burden of COVID-19 is increasing exponentially and as of 2nd July 2020, there were over 10, 834, 240 confirmed cases in about 213 countries and territories, with more than 519, 590 fatalities ( https://www. worldometers. info/coronavirus/). Currently, there are no specific antivirals or vaccines approved against COVID-19.
COVID-19 is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a new member of coronaviruses, a group of enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses ( 2 ). SARS-CoV-2 likely originated from Rhinolophus affinis bat species, based on 96. 2% nucleotide sequence identity to the bat coronavirus, BatCoV RaTG13 ( 3 ). The virus causes more severe disease in males than in females. Furthermore, COVID-19 is more severe in older persons than the youth ( 4 ). It is largely unclear why there is differential severity in age and sex. However, the severity of COVID-19 in males could be related to their higher ACE2 profiles ( 5 ).
Here, leveraging the recent finding by Hoffmann et al. ( 1 ) that ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are critical for SARS-CoV-2 cell entry, we discuss the potential link between the SARS-CoV-2 receptors and the prostate gland and whether SARS-CoV-2 is a potential oncogenic virus for prostate cancer.
SARS-CoV-2 Entry Into Human Cells
Entry of coronaviruses into target cells is facilitated by the spike (S) protein. Entry is dependent on binding of the surface unit, S1, of the S protein to a cellular receptor, which enhances viral attachment to the surface of target cells. Entry also requires priming of S protein by cellular proteases. The priming involves S protein cleavage at the S1/S2 and the S2′ site to allow viral and cellular membrane fusion, a process driven by the S2 subunit. SARS-CoV-2 engages angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as the entry receptor and serine protease TMPRSS2 for the S protein priming ( 1 ). The primary physiological role of ACE2 is the maturation of angiotensin, a peptide hormone that regulates vasoconstriction and blood pressure ( 2 ). ACE2 is a type I membrane protein expressed in the heart, lungs, kidneys, testes and intestine ( 2 , 4 ). Reduced expression of ACE2 is linked with many chronic conditions ( 2 ). Other conditions that are exacerbated by high ACE activity, such as prostate cancer ( 6 ), are potentially affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection, which reduces ACE2 since reduced ACE2 implies upregulated ACE activity ( 4 ).
On the other hand, TMPRSS2 plays a major role in SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and is coincidentally dysregulated in prostate cancer. Additionally, TMPRSS2 is highly expressed in prostate epithelial cells in an androgen-dependent manner. Taken together, the findings that SARS-CoV-2 utilizes ACE2 and TMPRSS2 presupposes that SARS-CoV-2 could be an oncogenic virus for prostate cancer. For cells lacking or with reduced TMPRSS2 expression, Furin preactivation promotes SARS-CoV-2 entry into target cells ( 7 ). Subsequently, we discuss why SARS-CoV-2 could be linked with prostate carcinogenesis.
Interplay Between SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Molecules and Prostate Biology
The role of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and ACE in the pathology of carcinomas is well-established. ACE generates an effector peptide of the RAS system, angiotensin II (Ang II) via degradation of the vasodilator kinins ( 8 ). The prostate independently synthesizes ACE. The angiotensin II type 1 receptor is the predominant Ang II prostatic receptor. Inhibition of ACE activity has been shown to suppress tumor growth and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo in animal models ( 9 ). Considering that ACE2 antagonizes the effects of ACE, it is probable that downregulation of ACE2 expression as in SARS-CoV-2 infection ( 4 ), which implies elevated ACE activity, may potentiate prostate carcinogenesis. This view is fortified by recent observation of SARS-CoV 2 in the semen of COVID-19 patients ( 10 ). The observation suggests that the virus could infect the prostate gland via SARS-CoV-2 entry molecules (ACE2 and TMPRSS2 or Furin), which are expressed by the prostate cells ( 11 , 12 ).
TMPRSS2 protein, utilized by SARS-CoV-2 for S protein priming is highly expressed in normal prostate epithelial and prostate cancer cells. Moreover, TMPRSS2 is expressed in an androgen-dependent manner, particularly in the prostate ( 13 ). Additionally, the fact that signaling through the androgen receptor (AR) axis facilitates prostate cancer development ( 14 ), suggests a relationship between TMPRSS2 and prostate cancer. Studies have linked TMPRSS2 to prostate cancer via a chromosomal translocation resulting in the fusion of the TMPRSS2 promoter-enhancer with the Erythroblast Transformation Specific (ETS) transcription factors ETS-related gene ( ERG ) and ETS translocation variant 1 ( ETV1 ) ( 13 ). This fusion recruits AR and TOP2B topoisomerase to chromosomal sites, where TOP2B instigates double-stranded breaks in DNA. Indeed, TMPRSS2-ERG fusion is associated with 40–70% of prostate cancer ( 13 ). SARS-CoV-2, cell entry is expected to reduce TMPRSS2, hence, lowering the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion. However, TMPRSS2 expression is increased in cells adjacent to SARS-CoV-2-infected cells ( 15 ). The increased TMPRSS2 expression could then promote TMPRSS2-ERG fusion events, hence predisposing male SARS-CoV-2-infected patients to prostate cancer. Alternatively, for cells lacking or with reduced TMPRSS2 expression, Furin preactivation promotes SARS-CoV-2 entry into target cells ( 7 ). Notably, the prostate gland and prostate cancer cells express Furin ( 11 ); thus, the virus may efficiently enter the prostate gland and/or prostate cancer cells using TMPRSS2 or Furin to initiate or enhance carcinogenesis.
Is SARS-CoV-2 a Potential Oncogenic Virus for Prostate Cancer?
Is SARS-CoV-2 therefore an oncogenic virus? First, the expression of SARS-CoV-2 cell entry molecules in the prostate gland strongly suggests a SARS-CoV-2 prostate gland tropism. Secondly, SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized by chronic inflammation ( 16 ). Chronic inflammation causes aberrant DNA methylation, which promotes cancer development ( 17 ). Inflammation is linked to about 60% of prostate cancer cases ( 18 ).
Changes in expression levels of TMPRSS2 have been previously associated with prostate cancer independently of SARS-CoV-2. Elevated expression of TMPRSS2 in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infections ( 15 ) implies that SARS-CoV-2 infection could increase chances of TMPRSS2 fusions, a phenomenon well-associated with prostate cancer development and progression ( 13 ). It is not precisely clear how SARS-CoV-2 may induce prostate cancer considering that it has not been shown to encode any known oncoprotein. However, given that SARS-CoV-2 can infect prostate cells, at least theoretically, it is probable that the virus can prompt prostate carcinogenesis via modulation of TMPRSS2 and/or exacerbating chronic inflammation in SARS-CoV-2 infected males ( 16 ). Taken together, it is plausible to hypothesize that SARS-CoV-2 could be an oncogenic virus for prostate cancer.
Conclusions
SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses are likely to remain in our midst for a long time. Although efforts are now geared toward the immediate preventive and treatment measures to avert fatalities, what we have presented above suggests that SARS-CoV-2 and similar coronaviruses could have long term effects such as involvement in cancer development. Specifically, we have highlighted a possible link between SARS-CoV-2 and prostate cancer based on the involvement of SARS-CoV-2 cell entry molecules on prostate biology. Nevertheless, detailed molecular and cell biology studies are warranted to prove our hypotheses.
Author Contributions
AD and CO conceived and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. TS and LP critically reviewed the draft. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
AD and CO were supported by a WACCBIP-World Bank ACE PhD fellowship (ACE02-WACCBIP: Awandare) and a DELTAS Africa grant (DEL-15-007: Awandare). The DELTAS Africa Initiative is an independent funding scheme of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS)’s Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA) and supported by the New Partnership for Africa’s Development, Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPARD Agency) with funding from the Wellcome Trust (107755/Z15/Z: Awandare).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell.(2020) 181: 271–80. doi: 10. 1016/j. cell. 2020. 02. 052
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
2. Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xia L, Guo Y, Zhou Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science.(2020) 367: 1444–8. doi: 10. 1126/science. abb2762
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
3. Zhou P, Yang X, Wang X, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature.(2020) 579: 270–3. doi: 10. 1038/s41586-020-2012-7
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
4. Cheng H, Wang Y, Wang G. Organ-protective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and its effect on the prognosis of COVID-19. J Med Microbiol.(2020) 2020: 1–5. doi: 10. 1002/jmv. 25785
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
5. Sama I, Ravera A, Santema B, Goor H, Maaten J, Cleland J, et al. Circulating plasma concentrations of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in men and women with heart failure and effects of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors. Eur Heart J.(2020) 41: 1810–7. doi: 10. 1093/eurheart/ehaa373
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
6. Wang Z, Li H, Jiang Z, Zhou T. Relationship between angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion gene polymorphism and prostate cancer susceptibility. J Can Res Ther.(2018) 14: 375–80. doi: 10. 4103/0973-1482. 171366
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
7. Shang J, Wan Y, Luo C, Ye G, Geng Q, Auerbach A, et al. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.(2020) 117: 11727–34. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 2003138117
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
8. Danilov SM, Kadrev AV, Kurilova OV, Tikhomirova VE, Kryukova OV, Mamedov VN, et al. Tissue ACE phenotyping in prostate cancer. Oncotarget.(2019) 10: 6349–61. doi: 10. 18632/oncotarget. 27276
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
9. Yasumatsu R, Nakashima T, Masuda M, Ito A, Kuratomi Y, Nakagawa T, et al. Effects of the angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril on tumor growth and angiogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol . (2004) 130: 567–73. doi: 10. 1007/s00432-004-0582-7
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
10. Li D, Jin M, Bao P, Zhao W, Zhang S. Clinical characteristics and results of semen tests among men with coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open.(2020) 3: e208292. doi: 10. 1001/jamanetworkopen. 2020. 8292
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
11. Couture F, D’Anjou F, Desjardins R, Boudreau F, Day R. Role of proprotein convertases in prostate cancer progression. Neoplasia.(2012) 14: 1032–42. doi: 10. 1593/neo. 121368
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
12. Song H, Seddighzadeh B, Cooperberg MR, Huang FW. Expression of ACE2, the SARS-CoV-2 receptor, and TMPRSS2 in prostate epithelial cells. Eur Urol.(2020) 78: 296–8. doi: 10. 1016/j. eururo. 2020. 04. 065
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
13. Mani RS, Amin MA, Li X, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Veeneman BA, Wang L, et al. Inflammation-induced oxidative stress mediates gene fusion formation in prostate cancer. Cell Rep.(2016) 17: 2620–31. doi: 10. 1016/j. celrep. 2016. 11. 019
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
14. Zhou Y, Bolton EC, Jones JO. Androgens and androgen receptor signaling in prostate tumorigenesis. J Mol Endocrinol.(2015) 54: R15–29. doi: 10. 1530/JME-14-0203
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
15. Matsuyama S, Nagata N, Shirato K, Kawase M, Takeda M, Taguchi F. Efficient activation of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein by the transmembrane protease TMPRSS2. J Virol.(2010) 84: 12658–64. doi: 10. 1128/JVI. 01542-10
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
16. Tay MZ, Poh CM, Rénia L, MacAry PA, Ng LFP. The trinity of COVID-19: immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat Rev Immunol.(2020) 20: 1–12. doi: 10. 1038/s41577-020-0311-8
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
17. Hattori N, Ushijima T. Epigenetic impact of infection on carcinogenesis: mechanisms and applications. Genome Med.(2016) 8: 1–13. doi: 10. 1186/s13073-016-0267-2
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
18. Sfanos KS, de Marzo AM. Prostate cancer and inflammation: the evidence. Histopathology.(2012) 60: 199–215. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2559. 2011. 04033. x
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
