1,657
12
Essay, 2 pages (300 words)

Classic and non classic analysis in likelife

ic and non ic analysis in ‘ Likelife’ ic style is identified by a collection of techniques which are used by the writer rather than the attitude depicted towards writing (Thomas and Turner 8). ‘ Likelife’ presents a mixture of classical and non classical forms of writing in literature as the writer uses these styles to explain the events that took place in the 2003 World Taxidermy Championship. It not only depicts the technique but the passion of the writer towards her topic of discussion. Thomas and Turner refer to this aspect as a concept used in classic style.
Orlean Susan The uses classic style in ‘ Likelife’ as she describes the culture portrayed in taxidermy events. This notion depicts the art of classic writing as the writer tends to know what she is scripting before the actual publication. She describes Taxidermy Championship as a culture that astonishes many people in the world. Susan presents the history of World Taxidermy Championship which portrays the concept of classic writing as it refers to classical events. The World Taxidermy Championship became popular in 1882. It was viewed as a culture of the Society of American Taxidermists.
Non classic style is reflected in Orlean’s writing where she presents the transformation of World Taxidermy Championship from being an ordinary cultural event to an economy generating sport (Thomas and Turner 8). This is due to its ability to raise much income annually. Taxidermy is estimated to raise 570million dollars annually. Economic reflection in literature is not a concept used in classic but modern writing as it depicts the influence of pop culture in literature. This form of transition from describing the sport as a traditional cultural practice to an economic event presents the difference between two eras thus depicting the art and role of non classic style as described by Thomas and Turner.
Work cited
Thomas, Francis-Noël and Turner, Mark. Clear and Simple as the Truth: Writing Classic Prose (Second Edition). New York. Princeton University Press. 2011. (Print)

Thank's for Your Vote!
Classic and non classic analysis in likelife. Page 1
Classic and non classic analysis in likelife. Page 2
Classic and non classic analysis in likelife. Page 3

This work, titled "Classic and non classic analysis in likelife" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2021) 'Classic and non classic analysis in likelife'. 17 November.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2021, November 17). Classic and non classic analysis in likelife. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/classic-and-non-classic-analysis-in-likelife/

References

AssignBuster. 2021. "Classic and non classic analysis in likelife." November 17, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/classic-and-non-classic-analysis-in-likelife/.

1. AssignBuster. "Classic and non classic analysis in likelife." November 17, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/classic-and-non-classic-analysis-in-likelife/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Classic and non classic analysis in likelife." November 17, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/classic-and-non-classic-analysis-in-likelife/.

Work Cited

"Classic and non classic analysis in likelife." AssignBuster, 17 Nov. 2021, assignbuster.com/classic-and-non-classic-analysis-in-likelife/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Classic and non classic analysis in likelife, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]