1,906
23
Article, 2 pages (300 words)

Air cargo article critique

China Airlines is facing a fine of up to $85, 410 in US dollars for transporting 15 barrels of iridium 192, a class 7 radioactive material, without the proper permit.  In addition to the source cited here, this article can be found in a variety of publications and sources includingGoogleFinance, since China Airlines (TPE: 2610) is a publicly traded company.

The barrels were kept in a warehouse from February 23rd to February 26th when the airline made application to and received approval to transport radioactive material from the Atomic Energy Council.

Employees at the Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport found relatively low radioactive levels of the iridium isotope which was being transported to Singapore from the United States.

The destination and intended use of the material is not known.  Iridium 193 is used to detect weaknesses in metal pipes, in radiotherapy, and in radiation treatment of certain cancers.

This article underscores the importance of airline industry regulation of hazardous material transportation.  The article also underscores the importance of consistency in inspection and detection techniques in international airports.

Since levels of radioactivity were low, perhaps employees in U. S. airports found no cause for concern.  It was probably assumed that the airline had the proper permit for handling and transporting the iridium.

It is reasonable and correct for the Atomic Energy Council to levy a fine for not having the proper transportation permit.  However, the Council needs to work with cargo carriers, international agencies, and airports to develop uniform inspection and detection protocols.

Inspection techniques should have examining transport licensing and permits as an objective.  Detection techniques should have determining acceptable radioactivity levels as an objective.  The techniques should have safe and timely transport of materials as a common goal.

Reference

CAL TO BE FINED FOR TRANSPORTING RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL WITHOUT PERMIT. (March 6, 2009). AsiaPulse News. Retrieved March 10, 2009, from General OneFile via Gale.

Google Finance.  China Airlines Ltd.(Public, TPE: 2610) Retrieved March 10.  2009, from http://www. google. com/finance? q= TPE: 2610

Thank's for Your Vote!
Air cargo article critique. Page 1
Air cargo article critique. Page 2
Air cargo article critique. Page 3

This work, titled "Air cargo article critique" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Article

References

AssignBuster. (2021) 'Air cargo article critique'. 17 November.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2021, November 17). Air cargo article critique. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/air-cargo-article-critique/

References

AssignBuster. 2021. "Air cargo article critique." November 17, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/air-cargo-article-critique/.

1. AssignBuster. "Air cargo article critique." November 17, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/air-cargo-article-critique/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Air cargo article critique." November 17, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/air-cargo-article-critique/.

Work Cited

"Air cargo article critique." AssignBuster, 17 Nov. 2021, assignbuster.com/air-cargo-article-critique/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Air cargo article critique, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]