1,503
6
Essay, 7 pages (1900 words)

A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain neuromodulation approach, which has demonstrated clinical efficacy for major depressive disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, stroke, and substance use disorders ( Mantovani et al., 2006 ; O’Reardon et al., 2007 ; Ludemann-Podubecka et al., 2015 ; Shen et al., 2016 ). In addition, rTMS intervention could enhance cognitive performance (e. g., inhibit control, decision making, working memory) in healthy individuals when targeting relative networks ( Bagherzadeh et al., 2016 ; Rahnev et al., 2016 ; Lowe et al., 2018 ). One important neural mechanism underlying these efficacy was the cortical plasticity induced from the rTMS stimulation.

Previous studies uncovered potential gender differences in rTMS induced cortical plasticity. The study conducted by Inghilleri and colleagues revealed ovarian hormones dependent effect of primary motor cortex (M1) excitability is present in females, whereas this is not present in males ( Inghilleri et al., 2004 ). The results indicated that females showed higher rTMS induced motor evoked potential (MEP) in the late menstrual cycle, which is consistent with the study by Smith and his colleagues ( Smith et al., 1999 , 2002 ). However, the difference of cortical excitability induced by TMS in male and female was not been found in young adulthood in other studies, but age-related cortical excitability discrepancy within gender shows that females progress more reduction of excitability in elderly age compared to male ( Sella et al., 2014 ; Polimanti et al., 2016 ). One reason for the absence of plasticity gender difference in young adulthood was that the menstrual cycle of female subjects was not considered. TMS could alter cognitive performance; females displayed reduced smile face mimicry and perception, after targeted in the right M1 and the right primary somatosensory cortex with continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), compared to targeted in the vertex, whereas males showed no TMS effects ( Korb et al., 2015 ). In terms of chronic treatment effects, a meta-analysis of rTMS on major depression patients revealed a dependency effect of sex, showing that females have higher response to treatment ( Kedzior et al., 2014 ). However, it is unclear whether rTMS treatment yields a comparable gender difference in drug abuse populations.

TMS induced cortical plasticity discrepancy in male and female rarely studied, it is unclear whether male and female respond equally to TMS. Two pilot studies for cocaine dependents included two females in 18 subjects and one female in 18 subjects ( Bolloni et al., 2016 ; Martinez et al., 2018 ), respectively. This defect was solved in a recent study, which reported rTMS suppresses craving in a group of female methamphetamine dependents ( Liu et al., 2018 ). The group of female methamphetamine dependents were treated by 10 Hz rTMS stimulation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), for a duration of 20 times in 4 weeks with 2000 pulses single session. The results showed that the cue-induced craving score significantly decreased in the treated group, compared to the untreated group, with lasting effects until another month in follow-up. The study sufficiently demonstrated the effectiveness of craving reduction in female groups with rTMS, which is consistent with the male groups ( Liu et al., 2017 ).

One priority for future research from the present study is to include the menstrual cycle of female dependents, which is inevitably included in 1-month course of treatment. Females have a higher sensitivity for cocaine in the follicular phase, and attenuate in the luteal phase ( Bobzean et al., 2014 ). It may be regulated by progesterone levels, which are consistent with cortical plasticity induced by paired TMS and more inhibition in the luteal phase (high progesterone level) compared to the follicular phase (low progesterone level) ( Smith et al., 1999 ). Individual genotypes would probably be tested before treatment in the future. For instance, the Val66Met (a type of brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene) carry an individual response unstable to TMS compared to Val66Val individuals ( Cheeran et al., 2008 ). Another factor has been ignored is response rate to non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in subjects, and the number that has been confirmed is 40% ( Lopez-Alonso et al., 2014 ).

One limitation of the study is that it excludes the involvement of a male group. Male and female subjects have difference in reasons of using drugs, addictive behavior, and peaking of craving progress. In the initial stage, men’s drug intake is more influenced by their peers, while women’s drug intake is more related to their mental state ( Becker and Chartoff, 2019 ). Female drug users alter from casual use to compulsive use more rapidly than males, and have a higher craving for drugs and relapse ( Bobzean et al., 2014 ). Moreover, females progress more mental health symptoms during treatment. These are also important factors influencing treatment effects. Another limitation the lack of longer follow-ups (e. g., relapse, craving). The author conducted a 2 month follow-up in the present study, and found that the treatment effect was still valid ( Liu et al., 2018 ). It is insufficient to assess the treatment effect of TMS for substance dependents, especially when the treatment effectiveness may differ in males and females.

In short, the present study demonstrated that rTMS can also reduce the craving of female methamphetamine dependents. In the future, we need to re-evaluate the similarities and differences between gender differences in treatment and brain function assessment by more clinical, cognitive and physiological indicators and protocols.

Author Contributions

YZ drafted the manuscript. YZ and HZ revised it. WH was in charge for the final version. All authors read and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31970991 and 81601166).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Bagherzadeh, Y., Khorrami, A., Zarrindast, M. R., Shariat, S. V., and Pantazis, D. (2016). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp. Brain Res. 234, 1807–1818. doi: 10. 1007/s00221-016-4580-1

||

Becker, J. B., and Chartoff, E. (2019). Sex differences in neural mechanisms mediating reward and addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 44, 166–183. doi: 10. 1038/s41386-018-0125-6

||

Bobzean, S. A. M., DeNobrega, A. K., and Perrotti, L. I. (2014). Sex differences in the neurobiology of drug addiction. Exp. Neurol. 259, 64–74. doi: 10. 1016/j. expneurol. 2014. 01. 022

||

Bolloni, C., Panella, R., Pedetti, M., Frascella, A. G., Gambelunghe, C., Piccoli, T., et al. (2016). Bilateral transcranial magnetic stimulation of the prefrontal cortex reduces cocaine intake: a pilot study. Front. Psychiatry 7: 133. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyt. 2016. 00133

||

Cheeran, B., Talelli, P., Mori, F., Koch, G., Suppa, A., Edwards, M., et al. (2008). A common polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS. J. Physiol. 586, 5717–5725. doi: 10. 1113/jphysiol. 2008. 159905

||

Inghilleri, M., Conte, A., Curra, A., Frasca, V., Lorenzano, C., and Berardelli, A. (2004). Ovarian hormones and cortical excitability. An rTMS study in humans. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 1063–1068. doi: 10. 1016/j. clinph. 2003. 12. 003

||

Kedzior, K. K., Azorina, V., and Reitz, S. K. (2014). More female patients and fewer stimuli per session are associated with the short-term antidepressant properties of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): a meta-analysis of 54 sham-controlled studies published between 1997-2013. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 10, 727–756. doi: 10. 2147/Ndt. S58405

||

Korb, S., Malsert, J., Rochas, V., Rihs, T. A., Rieger, S. W., Schwab, S., et al. (2015). Gender differences in the neural network of facial mimicry of smiles–An rTMS study. Cortex 70, 101–114. doi: 10. 1016/j. cortex. 2015. 06. 025

||

Liu, Q., Shen, Y., Cao, X., Li, Y., Chen, Y., Yang, W., et al. (2017). Either at left or right, both high and low frequency rTMS of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex decreases cue induced craving for methamphetamine. Am. J. Addict. 26, 776–779. doi: 10. 1111/ajad. 12638

|

Liu, T., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Liu, X., and Yuan, T. F. (2018). Gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 92, 70–75. doi: 10. 1016/j. pnpbp. 2018. 12. 018

|

Lopez-Alonso, V., Cheeran, B., Rio-Rodriguez, D., and Fernandez-Del-Olmo, M. (2014). Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul. 7, 372–380. doi: 10. 1016/j. brs. 2014. 02. 004

||

Lowe, C. J., Manocchio, F., Safati, A. B., and Hall, P. A. (2018). The effects of theta burst stimulation (TBS) targeting the prefrontal cortex on executive functioning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 111, 344–359. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2018. 02. 004

||

Ludemann-Podubecka, J., Bosl, K., and Nowak, D. A. (2015). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor recovery of the upper limb after stroke. Prog. Brain Res. 218, 281–311. doi: 10. 1016/bs. pbr. 2014. 12. 001

||

Mantovani, A., Lisanby, S. H., Pieraccini, F., Ulivelli, M., Castrogiovanni, P., and Rossi, S. (2006). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette’s syndrome (TS). Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 9, 95–100. doi: 10. 1017/S1461145705005729

||

Martinez, D., Urban, N., Grassetti, A., Chang, D., Hu, M. C., Zangen, A., et al. (2018). Transcranial magnetic stimulation of medial prefrontal and cingulate cortices reduces cocaine self-administration: a pilot study. Front. Psychiatry 9: 80. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyt. 2018. 00080

||

O’Reardon, J. P., Solvason, H. B., Janicak, P. G., Sampson, S., Isenberg, K. E., Nahas, Z., et al. (2007). Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Biol. Psychiatry 62, 1208–1216. doi: 10. 1016/j. biopsych. 2007. 01. 018

||

Polimanti, R., Simonelli, I., Zappasodi, F., Ventriglia, M., Pellicciari, M. C., Benussi, L., et al. (2016). Biological factors and age-dependence of primary motor cortex experimental plasticity. Neurol. Sci. 37, 211–218. doi: 10. 1007/s10072-015-2388-6

||

Rahnev, D., Nee, D. E., Riddle, J., Larson, A. S., and D’Esposito, M. (2016). Causal evidence for frontal cortex organization for perceptual decision making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, 6059–6064. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 1522551113

||

Sella, O., Jones, R. D., and Huckabee, M. L. (2014). Age and gender effects on submental motor-evoked potentials. Age 36: 9735. doi: 10. 1007/s11357-014-9735-z

||

Shen, Y., Cao, X., Tan, T., Shan, C., Wang, Y., Pan, J., et al. (2016). 10-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reduces heroin cue craving in long-term addicts. Biol. Psychiatry 80, e13–e14. doi: 10. 1016/j. biopsych. 2016. 02. 006

||

Smith, M. J., Adams, L. F., Schmidt, P. J., Rubinow, D. R., and Wassermann, E. M. (2002). Effects of ovarian hormones on human cortical excitability. Ann. Neurol. 51, 599–603. doi: 10. 1002/ana. 10180

||

Smith, M. J., Keel, J. C., Greenberg, B. D., Adams, L. F., Schmidt, P. J., Rubinow, D. A., et al. (1999). Menstrual cycle effects on cortical excitability. Neurology 53, 2069–2072. doi: 10. 1212/Wnl. 53. 9. 2069

||

Thank's for Your Vote!
A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents. Page 1
A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents. Page 2
A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents. Page 3
A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents. Page 4
A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents. Page 5
A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents. Page 6
A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents. Page 7
A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents. Page 8
A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents. Page 9

This work, titled "A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents'. 16 January.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, January 16). A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/a-commentary-on-gender-does-not-matter-add-on-repetitive-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-treatment-for-female-methamphetamine-dependents/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents." January 16, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/a-commentary-on-gender-does-not-matter-add-on-repetitive-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-treatment-for-female-methamphetamine-dependents/.

1. AssignBuster. "A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents." January 16, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/a-commentary-on-gender-does-not-matter-add-on-repetitive-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-treatment-for-female-methamphetamine-dependents/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents." January 16, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/a-commentary-on-gender-does-not-matter-add-on-repetitive-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-treatment-for-female-methamphetamine-dependents/.

Work Cited

"A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents." AssignBuster, 16 Jan. 2022, assignbuster.com/a-commentary-on-gender-does-not-matter-add-on-repetitive-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-treatment-for-female-methamphetamine-dependents/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving A commentary on gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]