1,990
20
Analysis Paper, 2 pages (350 words)

Waste management analysis

Question 1 Three conditions are often present when fraud exists. First, management or employees have an incentive or are under pressure, which provides them a reason to commit the fraud act. Second, circumstances exist – for example, absent or ineffective internal controls or the ability for management to override controls – that provide an opportunity for the fraud to be perpetrated. Third, those involved are able to rationalize the fraud as being consistent with their personal code of ethics. Some individuals possess an attitude, character, or set of ethical values that allows them to knowingly commit a fraudulent act. Using hindsight, identify factors present at Waste Management that are indicative of each of the three fraud conditions: incentives, opportunities, and attitudes.

Question 2 Review Waste Management’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1996. Identify accounts whose balances were likely based on significant management estimation techniques. Describe the reasons why the estimates were required for each of the accounts identified.

Question 3 Describe why accounts involving significant management estimation are generally viewed as inherently risky. Question 4 Review Auditing Standards (AU) Section 342, Auditing Accounting Estimates, and describe the auditor’s responsibilities for examining management-generated estimates. Also, AU Section 342 provides guidance to assist auditors in examining estimates. Describe the techniques commonly used by auditors to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s estimates.

Question 5 The Waste Management fraud primarily centered on inappropriate estimates of salvage values and useful lives for property and equipment. Describe techniques Andersen auditors could have used to assess the reasonableness of those estimates used to create Waste Management’s financial statements.

Question 6 Several of the Waste Management accounting personnel were formerly employed by the company’s auditor, Arthur Andersen. What are the risks associated with allowing former auditors to work for a client in key accounting positions? Research Section 206 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and provide a brief summary of the restriction related to the ability of a public company to hire accounting personnel who were formerly employed by the company’s audit firm.

Question 7 Discuss possible reasons why the Andersen partners allegedly allowed Waste Management executives to avoid recording the identified accounting errors. How could accounting firms ensure that auditors do not succumb to similar pressures on other audit engagements?

Thank's for Your Vote!
Waste management analysis. Page 1
Waste management analysis. Page 2
Waste management analysis. Page 3

This work, titled "Waste management analysis" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Analysis Paper

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Waste management analysis'. 10 January.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, January 10). Waste management analysis. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/waste-management-analysis/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Waste management analysis." January 10, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/waste-management-analysis/.

1. AssignBuster. "Waste management analysis." January 10, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/waste-management-analysis/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Waste management analysis." January 10, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/waste-management-analysis/.

Work Cited

"Waste management analysis." AssignBuster, 10 Jan. 2022, assignbuster.com/waste-management-analysis/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Waste management analysis, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]