1,115
16
Essay, 2 pages (500 words)

Shorthand

Personal Opinion on Shorthand Communication Admittedly, use of abbreviations in instant messaging is swiftly becoming a norm intoday’s multilingual world. Young adults and teenagers, who are popularly referred to as ‘ generation texts’, are the leading users of shorthand messaging. Allegedly, the main purpose of shorthand messages is to facilitate easy communication through the use of simplified letters and structures. Practically, shorthand messages comprise of informal abbreviation; either single letters or numerical integers replace entire words. For instance, ‘ lol’ stands for ‘ laugh out loud’ whereas ‘ b4’ stands for ‘ before.’ Shorthand messaging usually hinders smooth communication between persons of different generations, especially between teenage students and middle-aged teachers in schools (Lenore, 2012). In this context, a section of the languages fraternity discourages the use of shorthand messaging while the other portion encourages the communication behavior. Personally, I am fond of shorthand messaging. Not only would I encourage the young generation to use shorthand messaging, but I would also provide a nurturing environment for the shorthand communication culture to blossom.
Conservatives who are against the use of shorthand writing allege that abbreviations in communication are an outright assault on formal English. However, I am of the opinion that shorthand messaging is a natural evolution of English language. Undeniably, today’s formal English is substantially different from the formal English used in Shakespearian times. Language is a dynamic cultural component that evolves naturally with time (Lenore, 2012). Therefore, restricting the use of shorthand communication is an outright assault on cultural dynamism. In addition, I believe that language is a medium of expression; a channel through which one’s ideas and thoughts are documented. Instant messaging technologies today provide a means through which young people expresses themselves in a comfortable and simplified manner. Teachers hate to embrace the fact that teenagers in school would shallowly express themselves were they to use formal writing in class work (Lenore, 2012). For example, use of a frowning face at the end of an argument signifies presence of a counter-argument. Whenever shorthand communications are restricted, students fail to present their arguments wholly, partly because they are not accustomed to formal writing, and also because they are innately uncomfortable with dictates of language conservatisms.
In conclusion, it emerges that shorthand instant-messaging style is an essential part of language evolution. Actually, it is more like English language is taking its natural course. Use of any given language is only determined by its users. Habitual violation of traditional language rules represent popular decisions made by young language users. Unfortunately, the entire population of English language users may neither agree nor encourage the use of shorthand communication styles (Lenore, 2012). Nonetheless, those willing to push the language’s boundaries naturally do so with limited influence from dictates of the critics. B4 discouraging abbreviations in communication, it is worth acknowledging the effectiveness of shorthand messaging in facilitating efficient communication between young persons. In this regard, the blossoming shorthand instant-messaging belongs to the young generation, and should not be uprooted by condescending adults.
Reference List
Lenore, D. (2012) Changing Direction: A Practical Approach to Shorthand Communication. Pittsburg: Taylor & Francis.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Shorthand. Page 1
Shorthand. Page 2
Shorthand. Page 3
Shorthand. Page 4

This work, titled "Shorthand" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Shorthand'. 28 September.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, September 28). Shorthand. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/shorthand/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Shorthand." September 28, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/shorthand/.

1. AssignBuster. "Shorthand." September 28, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/shorthand/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Shorthand." September 28, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/shorthand/.

Work Cited

"Shorthand." AssignBuster, 28 Sept. 2022, assignbuster.com/shorthand/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Shorthand, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]