1,940
9
Essay, 2 pages (300 words)

Shlensky v. wrigley case

The paper ” Shlensky v. Wrigley Case” is an outstanding example of a law assignment.
Does a court of law have jurisdiction to interfere with honest business decisions of judgments that is devoid of conflict of interest, fraud or illegality?
Rule statement
A court has no jurisdiction to interfere with honest business decisions of judgments that is devoid of conflict of interest, fraud or illegality.
Analysis section
William Shlensky, a minority stockholder, sued the board of directors of Chicago Cubs for failing to install lights in the Wrigley Field which then meant that the field would not host nighttime baseball games. Subsequently, the lack of lights in the field made the board of directors incur a lot of losses. The court argued that the principles of corporate governance dictate that the affairs of a corporation must be run by a majority of the stockholders of the corporation. The rest of the directors, led by Wrigley, were however contented with Wrigley’s decision to restrict games played in the field for daytime alone. For this reason, the court was not convinced that the directors acted contrary to the organizational goals of the organization (Mallor, 2013).
During the hearing of the case, the court asserted that the complainant came up with his case after imagining that their team would be making as much money as other teams that played both at night and during the day (Mallor, 2013). Therefore, the corporate directors had not neglected their duties merely because they did not do as their counterparts did to get more money from the games. Additionally, the court concluded that there was not a substantial demonstration of an inappropriate behavior by the board of directors.
Conclusion statement
The court, therefore, affirmed the decision of the board of directors and ruled that defendants were right to have unanimously made the decision of not installing lights as a board.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Shlensky v. wrigley case. Page 1
Shlensky v. wrigley case. Page 2
Shlensky v. wrigley case. Page 3

This work, titled "Shlensky v. wrigley case" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Shlensky v. wrigley case'. 18 January.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, January 18). Shlensky v. wrigley case. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/shlensky-v-wrigley-case/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Shlensky v. wrigley case." January 18, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/shlensky-v-wrigley-case/.

1. AssignBuster. "Shlensky v. wrigley case." January 18, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/shlensky-v-wrigley-case/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Shlensky v. wrigley case." January 18, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/shlensky-v-wrigley-case/.

Work Cited

"Shlensky v. wrigley case." AssignBuster, 18 Jan. 2022, assignbuster.com/shlensky-v-wrigley-case/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Shlensky v. wrigley case, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]