1,850
21
Essay, 3 pages (550 words)

Panic, choke and learn

Human Resources: Case Study Human Resources: Case Study Question Problems with the Company’s Program In this electronic firm in Ontario, the selection program and management strategies in general are a huge challenge. The testing program is obviously detested by many workers who report varied issues about it. First, the irrelevancy/invalidity of the test content is a real problem that must be reviewed. Based on the nature of the company’s operations, asking workers to carry metal pegs in a bid to evaluate manual dexterity achieves nothing but frustration. Second, the confidentiality of the test outcomes subjects the integrity and transparency of the procedure to doubt. Evaluators are likely to dismiss or assign scores based on their liking. Third, the success rate of the test is extremely low which raises eye-brows. If only 20% are likely to pass the test then it seems like its serving a totally different purpose other than the intended. 50% success rate would be reasoning enough if the tests were valid and reliable (Gatewood, et al., 2011).
Question 2: How to Modify the Program
Based on the above highlighted problems reported on the selection program, a more motivating program that serves a relevant purpose should be adopted. First, the management team should devise and develop academic/mental interview questions and evaluation criteria that can assess employees on the electronic arena which is relevant to their job descriptions and not ask outrageous questions. To test for practical skills, the panel should ask the employees to perform some relevant operations using electronic equipment and replace the metal peg activity (Gatewood, et al., 2011). Also, much more transparency in the manner in which the procedure is undertaken should be enhanced such as openly printing out the results with the score criteria clearly elaborated.
Question 3: Grounds for Union to base its Argument to eliminate the Program
The union has valid arguments that can be backed up by the payment/compensation packages offered by the company. It can compare the kind of work the employees do with the remuneration. As reported, the company seeks to hire inexperienced workers so as to pay them as little as possible. Consequently, the confidentiality of the procedure is a point worth noting. The union can claim that the examinees’ results are tampered with since they are enclosed. Thirdly, the invalidity of the test questions is a strong argument to bring across as the activities asked to be performed are irrelevant with the nature of work. This is an indication that there is a hidden motive (Gatewood, et al., 2011).
Question 4: The Test against Human Rights-Information gathering
To ascertain that the aged worker was discriminated against, information about the eliminatory process in the program that sought to scrap off those who have the experience and capability but do not have the ‘ trendy’ aptitude skills required by the organization would have to be availed. As Gatewood et al. (2011) put it, the complainant must prove that the test they were subjected to were discriminatory in nature and favored one generation at the expense of the other. The payment scale information will also be a backup that the organization favors young person who can accept low wages. Owing to the deteriorating capacity of older people, the company could be taking advantage of this by examining those areas that are lowly scored by the aged such as strenuous metal peg transportation and mental tests.
Reference
Gatewood, R. D., Feild, H. S., & Barrick, M. R. (2011). Human resource selection. Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage Learning.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Panic, choke and learn. Page 1
Panic, choke and learn. Page 2
Panic, choke and learn. Page 3
Panic, choke and learn. Page 4

This work, titled "Panic, choke and learn" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Panic, choke and learn'. 27 September.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, September 27). Panic, choke and learn. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/panic-choke-and-learn/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Panic, choke and learn." September 27, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/panic-choke-and-learn/.

1. AssignBuster. "Panic, choke and learn." September 27, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/panic-choke-and-learn/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Panic, choke and learn." September 27, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/panic-choke-and-learn/.

Work Cited

"Panic, choke and learn." AssignBuster, 27 Sept. 2022, assignbuster.com/panic-choke-and-learn/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Panic, choke and learn, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]