1,375
29
Research Paper, 2 pages (350 words)

Measuring reliability

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is one of the most popularpersonalitytests in the world today.  However, data reviewed from more than twenty MBTI research studies has indicated that the test has inadequate validity.  In other words, MBTI does not adequately measure what it is meant to measure.  Moreover, MBTI has reported reliability coefficients for its four scales on general population samples in the ranges from 0. 61 to 0. 87.  Experts on psychometric testing reveal that reliability coefficients for short personality tests should actually be in the range of 0. 7 to 0. 8 (Psychometric Success).

Does this mean that MBTI is unreliable? – No.  While this important personality test sometimes reveals a lower reliability coefficient than the other personality tests, even when its reliability coefficient is close to 0. 61, the test is said to give us a dependable measure of the constructs it measures at least 61% of the time.  To put it another way, at least 61% of the people who use the MBTI once would see that their scores on the different constructs of the test would not change on a second testing session and all subsequent testing sessions.

Reliability is also known as “ repeatability” or “ consistency.”  A test with perfect reliability has a coefficient of 1. 0.  A test with no reliability whatsoever has a coefficient of 0.  A test with perfect reliability is one which gives us absolutely consistent results with the same sample.  The higher the reliability, the better is a test, scientifically, given that we can trust the results of this test with confidence, knowing that they will not change drastically through retesting (Trochim, 2006).

With MBTI, we can be confident that the test would show us a true picture of an individual’s personality at least 61% of the time.  Although this value is better than 50%, MBTI would have given us greater confidence in terms of its measurement if its reliability coefficient always fell in the range of 0. 8 to 0. 9.  This would have led us to believe that MBTI is most definitely a trustworthy measure of an individual’s personality type.

References

1. Psychometric Success. “ Myers-Briggs Widely Used But Still Controversial.” Available at http://www. psychometric-success. com/index. htm. (31 January 2007).

2. Trochim, William. (2006). “ Theory of Reliability.” Research Methods Knowledge Base. Available at http://www. socialresearchmethods. net/kb/reliablt. php. (31 January 2007).

Thank's for Your Vote!
Measuring reliability. Page 1
Measuring reliability. Page 2
Measuring reliability. Page 3

This work, titled "Measuring reliability" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Research Paper

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Measuring reliability'. 29 September.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, September 29). Measuring reliability. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/measuring-reliability/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Measuring reliability." September 29, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/measuring-reliability/.

1. AssignBuster. "Measuring reliability." September 29, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/measuring-reliability/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Measuring reliability." September 29, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/measuring-reliability/.

Work Cited

"Measuring reliability." AssignBuster, 29 Sept. 2022, assignbuster.com/measuring-reliability/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Measuring reliability, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]