1,932
20
Essay, 3 pages (550 words)

Case study

Case Brief: Fizz Factor Primary Strategy Coke’s primary strategy had been to strengthen and enhance their brand image that has been successful in gaining market leadership in a global scale.
Problem Identification
The problem that Coke is currently faced with is determining the most appropriate competitive strategy would achieve a consistency in Coke’s brand and enable them to sustain global market leadership.
Analysis
Using Miles and Snow’s framework, Coke appears to be using three diverse competitive strategies as defenders, prospectors and analyzers. As disclosed, prospectors are creators of change to which their competitors respond to. Due to the global leadership exemplified by Coke, they could also assume a defenders strategy by devoting current and future efforts to improving the efficiencies of their current and core competencies. Finally, as analyzers, Coke continue to undertake research and scan the environment for changes in demands and customers’ needs and preferences. Porter’s framework uses the five forces: rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes and threat of new entrants. Coke’s success in surpassing the performance of its competitors has been due to their continued commitment to review these five forces and determine strategies would effectively address defined threats and risks and tap existing opportunities.
Coke’s ability to maintain a proactive stance through continued research, employing
innovative and competitive strategies, and responding to the needs of the clientele have contributed to their leadership in a global scale. By consistently delivering high quality and affordable products, coupled with effective strategies for promotions, place, and price, Coke has sustained market profitability and assumed competitive advantage over its competitors.
Suggested Solution
The most appropriate competitive strategy that would allow an organization to develop a sustainable competitive advantage is offering a product with distinct competency that is difficult to copy by competitors. For Coke, their secret formula for the classic Coke had remained confidential and no competitor could copy or closely resemble the distinct taste that made Coke number 1.
Coke would have to continue to apply the various competitive strategies as defenders,
prospectors and analyzers and maintaining a proactive stance to effectively scan the environment, address the risks and threats and capture opportunities in the global market.
For Butler, the design strategy that would provide a consistency in Coke’s brand should apply the strategies as defender, prospector and analyzer, in creating a unified design for the global market. Butler’s evaluation of the 450 brands should streamline, delete, replace and maintain only those that are clearly identifiable to Coke. A unified and consistent brand would actually minimize costs and thereby maximize revenues that would further increase Coke’s financial performance and success.
Projected Outcome
A unified and consistent brand image would be easier to maintain and monitor and would assist in enhancing customers’ awareness of Coke, as an iconic global brand.
Value Added
The competitive strategies have been successful for Coke due to their ability to implement different strategies as deemed appropriate for the situation. Coke has always assumed a proactive stance in the creation of innovative strategies that would improve the quality of their product, improve packaging and design, employ various promotions and advertisements, and explore other markets, as necessary. All these efforts contributed to Coke’s iconic global brand,
making them the global leader in the soft drinks and beverage industry.
Works Cited
” Case #3: Fizz Factor.” Chapter 6: Competitive Strategies. n. d. 183-184.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Case study. Page 1
Case study. Page 2
Case study. Page 3
Case study. Page 4

This work, titled "Case study" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Case study'. 24 September.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, September 24). Case study. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/case-study-essay-samples-34/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Case study." September 24, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/case-study-essay-samples-34/.

1. AssignBuster. "Case study." September 24, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/case-study-essay-samples-34/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Case study." September 24, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/case-study-essay-samples-34/.

Work Cited

"Case study." AssignBuster, 24 Sept. 2022, assignbuster.com/case-study-essay-samples-34/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Case study, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]