1,986
24
Essay, 2 pages (400 words)

Brown vs. board comes up again

The other side argues that they are trying to integrate schools as said by Brown vs. Board. They see it as trying to keep segregation from happening, not making it happen. The case was defeated in two smaller courts but now is in the hands of the Supreme Court.
Ethically, the lines between the two sides are muddled, unclear, and hard to walk. The most taken ethical standpoint is that all segregation is wrong. The idea that segregation is ethical would not cross many minds at all. In fact, the ideas of ethics combat the very ideals of segregation at the core. Segregation always makes one side left out and short-changed, not a very ethical standpoint at all.
The Supreme Court has huge ethical obligations here. The Supreme Court is the highest judicial power in the country, and being so its rulings at looked at with great esteem and should be made with the proper wisdom and patience of any such huge decision. The Courts also have the ethical obligation to review all the facts and the stories of both sides, to make sure that this case is done fairly and receives its proper due process of law. Ethically the people on the court have a duty to the people in the case, the people on each side of the argument, and really the entire country. If an incorrect or hasty decision was to be made, the ill effects would ripple through the country, and possibly have ill effects on the future and other decisions. The image of the Court as a high ruling power may also be tarnished if the proper ethical obligations are not held.
This ruling is to have far-reaching effects, as it turns out many schools use such programs to help keep schools even. How ever, is it fair to say that a policy that tries to support integration is unfair to some kids If kids are not allowed in a school because of color, that is segregation. However, maybe the policy simply needs to be revised and looked at, and parts of it change. I do not think the parents are upset over the entire policy, just the fact of the affirmative action and their kids not being accepted based on color. The obligations of the court must be to the Constitution and other ethical material. This ruling could affect many school policies, and could also have the potential to stop affirmative action for students of color on the high school, or any level. This is going to be an interesting case, and the outcome will be a milestone for the future of affirmative action.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Brown vs. board comes up again. Page 1
Brown vs. board comes up again. Page 2
Brown vs. board comes up again. Page 3

This work, titled "Brown vs. board comes up again" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Brown vs. board comes up again'. 1 October.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, October 1). Brown vs. board comes up again. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/brown-vs-board-comes-up-again/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Brown vs. board comes up again." October 1, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/brown-vs-board-comes-up-again/.

1. AssignBuster. "Brown vs. board comes up again." October 1, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/brown-vs-board-comes-up-again/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Brown vs. board comes up again." October 1, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/brown-vs-board-comes-up-again/.

Work Cited

"Brown vs. board comes up again." AssignBuster, 1 Oct. 2022, assignbuster.com/brown-vs-board-comes-up-again/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Brown vs. board comes up again, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]