1,454
17
Essay, 2 pages (350 words)

Asset planning discussion post 5

Asset Planning Investment Suitability Age is always an essential aspect when determining the investment decisions of the elderly clients. It is apparent that Rebecca is taking advantage of her mother’s age to tamper with her investment decisions. For instance, Rebecca is plotting to change the investment advisor and portfolio without giving concrete reasons. In this scenario, the investment was not suitable because Joyce (the elderly woman) was unwilling and unable to understand the decisions that Rebecca was proposing (Stanley, 2014).
Another concern was that Rebecca did not understand the risks that would occur if the investment criteria were changed. Legally, she would be held liable for making decisions without involving her mother who is the genuine investor (Securities and Exchange Commission, 2003). As a result, a broker cannot proceed with the changes before getting permission from the original investor. It was evident that Joyce had no clue on the happenings and looked confused on the questions raised by the broker.
The first step a broker would take is to ensure that the original broker was consulted the proposed changes. This is to avoid impersonation and misrepresentation of material facts that would later jeopardize the agreement. Another viable step to take is to ignore the changes because of the investor’s age factor that cannot allow for a long-term investment plan. Similarly, investment objective was another issue that directly affects suitability (Securities and Exchange Commission, 2003). Rebecca wanted venture-capital type investments contrary to Joyce’s small-cap growth, which was against the agreement. In this regard, the lack of interest shown by Joyce was a clear manifestation that she was not privy to the proposals made by her daughter Rebecca. The investment advisor or broker should not make any changes since it is illegal and can result in financial losses (Stanley, 2014).
References
Stanley, M. (2014). “ Working with senior Investors.” Finance Journal. Web. Pp. 1-43. Retrieved
from
< http://www. sec. gov/investor/seniors/workingwseniors. pdf > Securities and Exchange Commission. (2003). “ Books and Records Requirements for Brokers
and Dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.” 17 CFR PARTs 240 and 242. Web. Retrieved from
< http://www. sec. gov/rules/final/34-44992. htm >

Thank's for Your Vote!
Asset planning discussion post 5. Page 1
Asset planning discussion post 5. Page 2
Asset planning discussion post 5. Page 3

This work, titled "Asset planning discussion post 5" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Asset planning discussion post 5'. 15 November.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, November 15). Asset planning discussion post 5. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/asset-planning-discussion-post-5/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Asset planning discussion post 5." November 15, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/asset-planning-discussion-post-5/.

1. AssignBuster. "Asset planning discussion post 5." November 15, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/asset-planning-discussion-post-5/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Asset planning discussion post 5." November 15, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/asset-planning-discussion-post-5/.

Work Cited

"Asset planning discussion post 5." AssignBuster, 15 Nov. 2022, assignbuster.com/asset-planning-discussion-post-5/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Asset planning discussion post 5, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]