1,484
17
Essay, 2 pages (300 words)

Textual analysis

The Concept of Beauty The concept of beauty is ive and variable because different individuals will interpret an object as beautiful based on their personal perspective and environmental factors. Therefore, it is unacceptable to define beauty as permanent because its very nature is impermanent. Thus, the concept of beauty is meaningless to an individual who denies there is beauty in an object or an idea of the same. What is judged beautiful by a person at one time might be ugly to the same individual at a different occasion or to another person at the same time. Specifically, this is because the concept of beauty has divergent comprehension understood by each person differently (Plato, Ferrari, and Griffith 245). For the beauty being objective, there must be a single eternal and unchangeable idea of it that all sensible things re to be judged. Similarly, just and holiness is subjective and variable because their very nature is impermanent. The objects of opinion, such as beauty, just and piety is in constant flux; thus, they cannot be termed knowledge because knowledge is permanent in nature (being).
Leadership and opinion vary based on the situation and the environmental factors. However, in its fundamental nature, knowledge is permanent and remains so regardless of the situation or circumstances. In application, a leader makes decisions based on his knowledge of a matter but the decision is influenced by other factors such that the conclusion arrived at one particular time under special circumstances can vary from another occasion in similar circumstances. Similarly, opinion about an issue is impermanent because, under dissimilar circumstances, individuals give different views on the same subject. Regardless of this, the knowledge of these persons does not change irrespective of the condition. In that accord, it agrees that the concept of leadership and opinion has a similar definition as the notion of justice, piety and beauty.
Works Cited
Plato, G R. F. Ferrari, and Tom Griffith. The Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. Kindle file.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Textual analysis. Page 1
Textual analysis. Page 2
Textual analysis. Page 3

This work, titled "Textual analysis" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Textual analysis'. 4 October.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, October 4). Textual analysis. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/textual-analysis-essay-samples/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Textual analysis." October 4, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/textual-analysis-essay-samples/.

1. AssignBuster. "Textual analysis." October 4, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/textual-analysis-essay-samples/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Textual analysis." October 4, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/textual-analysis-essay-samples/.

Work Cited

"Textual analysis." AssignBuster, 4 Oct. 2022, assignbuster.com/textual-analysis-essay-samples/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Textual analysis, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]