1,286
11
Essay, 1 pages (200 words)

Philosophy of science

Response to questions of Philosophy of Science Response to Question There is a real risk in saying “ real scientists”. This is because the concept “ real scientists” implies that there are some scientists who are not real or pseudoscientists. This concept, therefore, would raise the critical question of demarcating between the “ real scientists” and the “ pseudoscientists”. Since there is no clear-cut and holistic criterion of demarcating the “ real scientists” and the “ pseudoscientists”, this practical attitude of terming some scientists “ real scientists” and other scientists “ pseudoscientists”, would allow us to be arbitrary and to favour scientific hypotheses put forward by prominent scientists, at the expense of lesser, or not prominent, scientists.
Response to Question 2
Unlike Dunhem’s rather practical view that, ” it is never possible to deduce any statement about what will be observed from a single hypothesis alone”, rather, other assumptions and conditions etc. are in the mix as well”, Popper did not allow for such practical matters. This is because for Popper, induction cannot give us any true knowledge about reality. For Popper, any scientific theory is tentative and will soon or later be refuted and superseded by other better scientific theories. For this reason, Popper wants us to shoot down any scientific prediction that comes from a hypothesis, even though that hypothesis cannot exist in isolation.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Philosophy of science. Page 1
Philosophy of science. Page 2

This work, titled "Philosophy of science" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Philosophy of science'. 2 October.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, October 2). Philosophy of science. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/philosophy-of-science-essay-samples-3/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Philosophy of science." October 2, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/philosophy-of-science-essay-samples-3/.

1. AssignBuster. "Philosophy of science." October 2, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/philosophy-of-science-essay-samples-3/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Philosophy of science." October 2, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/philosophy-of-science-essay-samples-3/.

Work Cited

"Philosophy of science." AssignBuster, 2 Oct. 2022, assignbuster.com/philosophy-of-science-essay-samples-3/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Philosophy of science, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]