1,150
14
Essay, 2 pages (400 words)

Philosophy in education

Philosophy in Education The traditional definition of the words liberal and conservative ultimately can be understood as a fundamental breakdown in understanding with regards to whether new ways should be employed or whether the old ways are still the best means of accomplishing a given task. In the same way, the field of education represents the “ liberal” and “ conservative” views regarding whether perennialism or progressivism is the best approach towards engaging students with a given topic.
Perennialism can be understood to be the “ conservative” approach in that it argues that the same tried and true methods and subject matter should continue to be taught to the next generation of students do the fact that it is both tried and true and has informed the preceding generations. On the other hand, progressivism takes the more “ liberal” approach in positing that individuality, progress, and change are key cornerstones of a truly great education (Labaree 281). Naturally, he progressivists approach to education has been largely informed by many sociological, anthropological, educational, and psychological breakthroughs of the 21st century.
If one were to choose to follow a strictly perennialist approach to education, a very formulaic approach would ensue; one that placed a high level of emphasis on utilizing the relevant and historical primary texts that have informed education and thought throughout the centuries. For instance, a class on music would be taught focusing upon classical music theory, the works of Brahms, Bach, and Beethoven, and healthy amount of analysis and discussion of the symphony and the role of chamber groups. In this way, contemporary writings or the introduction of new material, rock n roll, jazz, or even swing music would likely not be included.
It is the belief of this particular student that the best approach is thereby the progressivist approach. Due to the fact that our world continues to change at such an alarming rate, focusing solely and single-mindedly upon a strict interpretation of classical texts, and the ways in which knowledge has been inferred for hundreds even thousands of years may not be an appropriate way to better the learning understanding of the pupils involved in the process. Although the progressivists also exhibit some shortcomings, it is the belief of this author that such an approach could better inform the next generation of open minded professionals with regards to the key information they should seek to retain.
Work Cited
Labaree, David F. ” Progressivism, Schools And Schools Of Education: An American Romance.” Paedagogica Historica 41. 1/2 (2005): 275-288. Academic Search Complete. Web. 10 Feb. 2013.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Philosophy in education. Page 1
Philosophy in education. Page 2
Philosophy in education. Page 3

This work, titled "Philosophy in education" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Philosophy in education'. 11 October.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, October 11). Philosophy in education. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/philosophy-in-education/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Philosophy in education." October 11, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/philosophy-in-education/.

1. AssignBuster. "Philosophy in education." October 11, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/philosophy-in-education/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Philosophy in education." October 11, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/philosophy-in-education/.

Work Cited

"Philosophy in education." AssignBuster, 11 Oct. 2022, assignbuster.com/philosophy-in-education/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Philosophy in education, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]