2,030
21
Essay, 2 pages (350 words)

Federal courts jurisdiction

Running header: UNITED S VERSUS ALFONSO LOPEZ, Jr. United s versus Alfonso Lopez, Jr discussion of limitations of federal power United States versus Alfonso Lopez, Jr. In the case of United States versus Alfonso Lopez, Jr. 514 U. S. 549 a 12th grade student Alfonso Lopez, Jr. admitted to carrying a handgun on school property in San Antonio, Texas. He was arrested and charged under Texas law for possession of a firearm on school premises. The next day however, the charges were dismissed and federal agents charged him with violating the Gun Free School Zones Act of 1990. (United States v. Lopez, 1995) This was a landmark case in that it established the supremacy of the Federal Courts over state courts and jurisdiction within individual states. However, the end result of the case was that the charges by the federal government were dismissed and in a statement by Judge Rehnquist the reasoning was that it was time to step in and check the powers of the federal government by defining the powers between the federal government and the individual state. The prosecutions argument rested the use of the Interstate Commerce Act, this act specifically being designed to prevent unfair business practices by shifting regulatory abilities from the state governments to that of the federal government. (Interstate Commerce Act, 1887) The case was upheld by a decision of 5-4 and helped define what was allowed directly by the Interstate Commerce Act. Supreme Court Justice Rehnquist made it clear that this incident was not something that should be allowed under the Commerce Act however, further stated that this decision was not meant to change prior decisions in regards to the Commerce Act. The decision was meant only to limit the current scope of the Federal Government in regards to incidents occurring within each individual state. The decision clarified the separation of power that exists between the individual states and that of the Federal Government. References: Interstate Commerce Act,. (1887,). Jrank, law library, interstate commerce act of 1887 (24 stat. 379 [49 u. s. c. a. § 1 et seq.]) . Retrieved from http://law. jrank. org/pages/7759/Interstate-Commerce-Act. html United States v. Lopez,. (1995,). Supreme court of the united states, no. 93-1260, united states, petitioner v. alfonso lopez, jr. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit . Retrieved from http://www. law. cornell. edu/supct/html/93-1260. ZO. html

Thank's for Your Vote!
Federal courts jurisdiction. Page 1
Federal courts jurisdiction. Page 2
Federal courts jurisdiction. Page 3

This work, titled "Federal courts jurisdiction" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2021) 'Federal courts jurisdiction'. 16 December.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2021, December 16). Federal courts jurisdiction. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/federal-courts-jurisdiction/

References

AssignBuster. 2021. "Federal courts jurisdiction." December 16, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/federal-courts-jurisdiction/.

1. AssignBuster. "Federal courts jurisdiction." December 16, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/federal-courts-jurisdiction/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Federal courts jurisdiction." December 16, 2021. https://assignbuster.com/federal-courts-jurisdiction/.

Work Cited

"Federal courts jurisdiction." AssignBuster, 16 Dec. 2021, assignbuster.com/federal-courts-jurisdiction/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Federal courts jurisdiction, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]