1,132
4
Evaluation Essay, 3 pages (600 words)

Evaluation

Article evaluation due: The article is d “ How do informal self-care strategies evolve among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease managed in primary care? A qualitative study.” It was peer-reviewed and published in the International Journal of COPD on February 26th, 2014. The authors include Lindsay D Apps, Samantha L Harrison, Johanna EA Williams, Nicky Hudson, Michael Steiner, Mike D Morgan, and Sally J Singh. All the authors except Hudson are affiliated to the National Institute of Health Research CLAHRC-LNR Pulmonary Rehabilitation Research Group from the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK. Hudson is affiliated with the School of Applied Social Sciences from De Montfort University, Leicester while Singh is also associated with Applied Research Centre Health & Lifestyle Interventions of Coventry University, Coventry.
The study addressed several problems facing patients with less severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). They specifically investigated the patients’ experience and understanding of COPD symptoms, current self-care activities, and the importance of family perceptions in managing COPD. The main subject of the study consists of patients with COPD, how they manage the condition, the challenges they encounter and the importance of having the support of family members (Apps et al., 2014). The aim of this study is to understand the experiences of individuals with less severe COPD and the challenges they face while undergoing self-care.
The study population comprised of participants who had a positive diagnosis of COPD and had not been rehabilitated for pulmonary complications in the past year. They were also required not to have any neurological, cognitive or locomotor problems. The study design was cross-sectional, and the authors analyzed the data using thematic analysis, which permits identification of patterns of the data and better descriptions (Apps et al., 2014). The results of the study identified difficulty in breathing as the major symptom that the patients underwent. Also, the patients in their early stages of the condition had problems getting support from their family members since the symptoms are not visible from outside. Most patients did not know when to start engaging in the self-care procedures, and what to expect as the conditions increased in intensity (Apps et al., 2014).
The results are clear since they give in detail what the patients’ experiences were, and the challenges they face while undergoing self-care. The results have also addressed the questions since they give us a picture of what a patient with COPD goes through and the challenges they face when undertaking self-care. The results also seem valid since they report the actual experiences of these patients, without relying on secondary sources of information. The analysis is also valid, based on the study design.
The conclusions are consistent with the study design and analysis since they report the results of the interview and the outcomes as per the analysis. Most studies show the same symptoms of COPD, and report that self-care and family support are important facets of the management process. However, they are usually concentrated on the severe cases of COPD (Apps et al., 2014)
The results mean that healthcare providers need to sensitize the public of this condition and the importance of individual care or by a family member. It also means that as a health care provider, I need to inform the patients of the need to take the self-care seriously for it to bear fruit. The patients are required to cooperate with the health care providers so as to be informed of their case and how best to handle it.
References
Apps, L. D., Harrison, S. L., Williams, J. E., Hudson, N., Steiner, M., Morgan, M. D., & Singh, S. J. (2014). How do informal self-care strategies evolve among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease managed in primary care? A qualitative study. International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 9, 257.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Evaluation. Page 1
Evaluation. Page 2
Evaluation. Page 3
Evaluation. Page 4

This work, titled "Evaluation" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Evaluation Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Evaluation'. 4 January.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, January 4). Evaluation. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/evaluation/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Evaluation." January 4, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/evaluation/.

1. AssignBuster. "Evaluation." January 4, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/evaluation/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Evaluation." January 4, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/evaluation/.

Work Cited

"Evaluation." AssignBuster, 4 Jan. 2022, assignbuster.com/evaluation/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Evaluation, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]