Essay, 2 pages (350 words)

Case analysis

Case Analysis Case Analysis Case Overview Case facts revealed that a bank apparently advertised home loans at lowinterest rates for its account holders for three months. Toward the end of the second month, the bank withdraws the offer. Sam opens an account with the bank because of the offer. He is, however, a little late applying for the loan and the offer is withdrawn before his application is processed. Sam sues the bank. The analysis hereby requires assessing the banks obligation and Sams claim.
The case is hereby analyzed initially from the point of view of Sam. If Sam opened the account with the bank for the sole purpose of availing of the home loan, he should have been made aware that applying for a loan does not necessarily indicate that he could immediately be approved just because he has an account with the bank. As stipulated, the home loans at low interest rates were offered for account holders; meaning, those who have had established a historical experience as an account holder for a considerable amount of time could avail of the home loan (but does not guarantee approval). As he was an account holder and assuming he met all the requirements needed to avail of the home loan within the two-month period, his application could still have been processed, as promised and he could follow up with the loan officer the decision on his home loan application. Still, it does not guarantee that his application would be approved.
In this regard, Sam could not sue the bank simply on the premise that the bank withdrew the offer toward the end of the second month, since there could also be valid reasons for this. Taking it from the perspective of the bank, their legal department is sure to have covered all the rules and laws pertinent to making the promotional offer and must have stipulated that they have to option to withdraw the offer for reasons beyond their control (like a bad turn of the economy; stipulations from the government, like what happened with sub-prime mortgage loans; and no account holder qualified to avail of the home loans).

Thank's for Your Vote!
Case analysis. Page 1
Case analysis. Page 2
Case analysis. Page 3

This work, titled "Case analysis" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay


AssignBuster. (2022) 'Case analysis'. 1 October.


AssignBuster. (2022, October 1). Case analysis. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/case-analysis-essay-samples-8/


AssignBuster. 2022. "Case analysis." October 1, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/case-analysis-essay-samples-8/.

1. AssignBuster. "Case analysis." October 1, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/case-analysis-essay-samples-8/.


AssignBuster. "Case analysis." October 1, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/case-analysis-essay-samples-8/.

Work Cited

"Case analysis." AssignBuster, 1 Oct. 2022, assignbuster.com/case-analysis-essay-samples-8/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Case analysis, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]